This $152-million deal raises questions about Ottawa's affordable housing strategy | Opinion

Krystin Stacenko outside her rental home, Sunday, Sept. 27, 2026, one of 503 properties now owned by Ottawa Community Housing, says tenants received little to no notice of the change, with many learning about it through news reports and uncertain about what the new ownership will mean for them. Photo by Ashley Fraser /POSTMEDIA

Article content

Article content

The benefits of the $159.2-million deal, the largest OCH has ever made, are not immediately obvious. The housing agency says it is “protecting these homes as part of Ottawa’s long-term affordable housing supply.”

Article content

Article content

Article content

Protecting them from what, exactly?

Article content

In response to my question about whether the properties were on the market or part of a redevelopment plan, OCH cited its mandate “to preserve and expand access to affordable housing over the long term,” and added “OCH cannot speculate on what might otherwise have happened with these properties.”

Article content

So, no immediate threat then. What about expanding access to affordable housing?

Article content

If anything, OCH ownership will reduce it. A city memo to councillors says 308 of the units are already at or below average market rent under their now-former owner Minto. Rather than freeze or reduce those rents to boost affordability, OCH will bring all units to average market rent over five years, as tenants move out.

Article content

How does that help people get affordable housing?

Article content

There are a couple of other financial factors that might have warranted scrutiny. The Nepean townhouses and small apartment buildings OCH bought were built in the 1970s and 1980s. What current or future repair liability do they represent?

Article content

OCH says they are in good shape for their age, but the city housing agency already has a repair backlog of about $100 million. Why add more?

Article content

Article content

Then there is the loss of property taxes. Under private owner Minto, taxes were paid on these units. Now they are not. The city staff memo doesn’t mention or quantify that cost.

Article content

Article content

Same with the cost of the overall deal. In touting its “historic” acquisition, OCH failed to include the purchase price, an omission repeated in the memo to councillors from senior city staff. OCH did provide the number on request, but the fact that it was initially excluded is telling.

Article content

In the world of government, cost and benefit have little connection. When the cause is deemed noble, they may have no importance at all.

Article content

The purchase does have one clear benefit. About 100 of the units will be used to help homeless families, eventually. Of course, the same result could have been obtained by buying 100 units, not 503.

Article content

In an interview, OCH chief development officer Cliff Youdale suggested the Nepean deal was too good to pass up. Most of them have two or three bedrooms, enough to accommodate a family. Building a unit like that new could cost $750,000, he says, but OCH got them for about $300,000 a unit. Youdale says they were well priced because big rental investors don’t like the age and the relatively low rents.