‘We can’t afford to do what Mexico can do’: Can Trump play Canada and Mexico against each other?

Article content

But the Mexican side was probably not surprised, said Diego Marroquín Bitar, fellow at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, referring to how former USTR Robert Lighthizer originally wanted it at 85 per cent.

Article content

“It makes sense for them to go back to their original position,” Marroquín said, though that doesn’t mean Mexico will accept it.

Article content

“There’s a reason why the Mexicans and the Canadians didn’t accept the original 85 per cent request … because the auto industry couldn’t take it,” he said.

Article content

He also pointed to how the sides negotiated a gradual approach last time, giving auto companies time to adapt to comply with the agreement.

Article content

“So anything that’s negotiated from now on will definitely have to include some gradual implementation,” he added.

Article content

But Marroquín is more concerned by the proposed 50 per cent U.S. content floor.

Article content

“The 50 per cent minimum US content floor would be devastating for the auto industry. It would cause major disruption,” Marroquín said, referring to the need for flexibility to make auto production efficient.

Article content

But that may not be the case for Canada.

Article content

Article content

According to Matthew Holmes of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, most Canadian vehicles already effectively meet the 50 per cent U.S. content threshold.

Article content

“It’s not as acute an issue for us,” he said.

Article content

The real disruptor for Canada, he said, are the Section 232 tariffs on autos, steel, and aluminum, which are driving layoffs in Canada and raising U.S. car prices — all while failing to boost U.S. production as intended.

Article content

Marroquín also emphasized that layering stricter rules of origin atop the 232 tariffs would risk job losses in all three countries while reducing North America’s competitiveness against Asia and Europe.

Article content

“If you make the rules of origin more stringent and you still have tariffs on top of them, that can really destabilize the auto industry,” he said.

Article content

While the 50 per cent U.S.-specific requirement may be less vexing for Canada, Canada is more vulnerable than Mexico when it comes to boxing out China, which Washington is keen to do.

Article content

Dade urged Canada to recognize that Mexico faces a different set of strategic pressures – namely the need to retain jobs and avoid civil unrest — and has an easier path on the China question.

Article content

Article content

“This time around, China is front and center,” Dade said, referring to how it’s been a key part of the 19 trade agreements Washington has forged with other countries.

Article content

Canada exports far more to China than Mexico, he said.

Article content

“We can’t afford to do what Mexico can do.”

Article content

Negotiations over rules of origin changes are likely to continue in the weeks to come, running up to the July 1 review date. But LeBlanc has repeatedly said he is not concerned by having a resolution before then.

Article content

“We’ve got to be careful not to set up a cliff that doesn’t exist,” LeBlanc said Tuesday, noting how CUSMA remains in place for 10 more years even if there is no consensus by the three parties to extend it for 16 years.

Article content

Besides, biding their time might benefit Canadian negotiators, some trade watchers say, especially if control of Congress swings to the left in the November U.S. midterm elections.

Article content

“Wait it out,” said Hale. “A future Congress and president will likely come to their senses by then.”

Article content

National Post

Article content

Article content