Letters to The Vancouver Sun: The plebiscite question we need, says doctor   

Here is the plebiscite question that would be much more helpful: Does the City of Vancouver commit to working with public health and provincial authorities to develop programs to ensure that active drug-users are identified, engaged in care and provided optimal access to staffed treatment beds and dignified housing? Photo by Arlen Redekop /PNG

Article content

Article content

On Aug. 14, city council approved two plebiscite questions to be added to the ballot for the municipal election in October. These deal with a proposed interdiction on hard drug use in public spaces and a conversion of portions of the old St. Paul’s Hospital to house substance-users in recovery or others with mental-health disorders.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Both questions miss the mark. As for reducing open-air drug use, it requires enforcement personnel we don’t have and can’t afford. It will lead to the levying of fines that will not be paid or the criminalization of individuals into a system that is already overextended. As for treatment beds, offering more of them makes no sense while existing beds aren’t fully staffed. As many as 30 per cent of them are currently closed due to a lack of health-care personnel to permit their full use. More beds added to the system soon will simply mean … more unstaffed and closed beds.

Article content

Article content

Here is the plebiscite question that would be much more helpful: Does the City of Vancouver commit to working with public health and provincial authorities to develop programs to ensure that active drug-users are identified, engaged in care and provided optimal access to staffed treatment beds and dignified housing?

Article content

Dr. Brian Conway, president and medical director, Vancouver Infectious Diseases Centre

Article content

Canadians proud to stand tall against bullying

Article content

Prime Minister Carney spoke to our nation to announce Canada had pulled out of trade negotiations with the U.S. and will stand firm against President Trump and his absurd tariffs in his trade war.

Article content

Article content

Our decision as Canadians to stand tall with our PM and take the economic hits coming our way must be considered a parallel to Ukraine in defending itself against Vladimir Putin, another bully.

Article content

Article content

Some tough times will be coming our way and, like the Ukrainians, we must be firm in our resolve to suffer as we defend our independence and sovereignty.

Article content

It won’t be easy. Neither will it be short-lived. It will likely get worse before getting better. Hang in everyone.

Article content

Peter Gordon, Squamish

Article content

Enough is enough, President Trump

Article content

When Prime Minister Carney delivered in Davos his bold “middle power” solution to counter superpower dominance in world affairs, he marked himself as the standard against which his theory would be measured.

Article content

Thankfully he passed the litmus test when he said a resounding no to the U.S.’s onerous last-minute demands. When he decided to withdraw from trade talks he made clear he wasn’t just grandstanding but firmly believed in his stand.

Article content

Besides, had he agreed meekly, it would have made Canada a de facto 51st state to Trump’s glee. Perhaps other nations will now take note and begin calling out Trump’s bullying, finally.