Frank Stronach’s lawyers seek mistrial after victim’s lawyer allegedly tried to ‘extract money’

Canadian businessman Frank Stronach leaves the Ontario Superior Court of Justice after being found guilty of sexual assault on June 19, 2026. Photo by Nick Kozak /Postmedai

Article content

Lawyers for autoparts billionaire Frank Stronach are in Ontario Superior Court this morning seeking a mistrial in his ongoing sexual assault trial, in which he has already been found guilty in relation to historical crimes against two women.

Article content

“These are unusual circumstances,” said Judge Anne Molloy, who found Stronach guilty last month.

Article content

Article content

At issue is a shocking new claim that a lawyer for one of the victims contacted Stronach’s lawyer Leora Shemesh two weeks after the verdicts to, as she told Molloy this morning, “extract money,” without going through the formal process of litigation. He even sketched out the details of what he would accept, nearly a million dollars based on $275,000 damages, $25,000 in legal fees, and interest since the early 1980s.

Article content

Article content

Shemesh said there is a risk of a miscarriage of justice in the case because the narrative of the crime provided by this lawyer, Shale Wagman, is different than what the complainant A.S. testified in court. Judge Molloy said she agreed with this concern about risk, and that there are significant inconsistencies.

Article content

Article content

“Wouldn’t he have read my decision?” Molloy said, rhetorically, and discussed potentially calling Wagman as a witness to see whether he was actually operating under his client’s instructions, and whether A.S. actually told him the details of the crime that he related to Shemesh, which contradict her evidence earlier this year. Molloy called the situation “bizarre.”

Article content

“I agree, it’s quite unusual, because as your honour knows, she could have waited until October (to discuss a financial settlement), because there’s no statute of limitations (on sexual assault),” Shemesh said.

Article content

In her reasons, Molloy wrote about finding A.S. to be “a compelling, believable, and truthful witness,” who exhibited an “extreme fairness,” sometimes seeming to be “cross-examining herself, wondering if she was giving ‘mixed messages.’” But she also described misgivings about her reliability, but decided they were “explained to my satisfaction. They do not shake my confidence that the event she described did happen, just the way she described it.”

Article content

Article content

A.S. was a waitress who had been fired from a bar Stronach owned. The sexual assault for which Molloy has already found him guilty was a groping in his apartment after a dinner meeting to discuss her employment. It was among the more minor of the crimes initially alleged.

Article content

Article content

“I’m reluctant to declare a mistrial without hearing from her,” Molloy said today. But she was clear that if the witness told her lawyer one thing, and the court another, and Molloy relied on her testimony to find Stronach guilty, then a mistrial would have to follow.

Article content

The hearing continues.

Article content

Article content