Scott Stinson: Ontario Appeal Court hands Doug Ford a win, allows bike lane removals

Cyclists ride down the bike lanes on Royal York Road in Mimico, Toronto, Ontario on Friday, June 26, 2026. Photo by Peter Power /Postmedia

Article content

The next time Doug Ford goes on one of his off-script rants about activist judges, he might want to include a qualifier.

Article content

Not all judges, that is.

Article content

Article content

The Ontario Court of Appeal delivered a big win for the Ontario Premier on Friday, overturning a lower court decision that had blocked the province’s plan to rip up bike lanes on three downtown Toronto streets.

Article content

The initial court decision found that removing bike lanes amounted to a violation of the right to personal safety found in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but the Appeal Court, in a 3-0 decision, comprehensively dismissed that idea.

Article content

Article content

Among the many flaws it found in the initial court ruling, the Court of Appeal said that the province’s bike-lane removal was “the sort of decision legislatures make routinely without attracting any concerns about the constitutionality of their actions.”

Article content

Article content

It also said that there is “no Charter right to bicycle lanes” and it gave this rather blunt declaration: “The bottom line is this: there is no constitutional obligation to regulate the use of roads in any particular manner — no constitutional obligation to build bicycle lanes or to retain any that have been built.” 

Article content

The Ford government was pleased on Friday with its victory.

Article content

“Today’s court ruling is a victory for common sense and for respecting the appropriate division of roles between duly elected legislatures and the courts,” said a statement from Prabmeet Sarkaria, the provincial Minister of Transportation. “As the three justices unanimously ruled today, ‘it is illegitimate for courts to involve themselves in matters of legislative policy.'”

Article content

The Appeal Court actually went a little further than that, writing in its decision that the lower court ruling “(subverted) a fundamental principle of our democratic constitutional order: a legislature cannot bind its successors. Legislatures in the Westminster tradition are free to undo legislation by amending or repealing it as they see fit.”

Article content

Article content

But while, legally speaking, this was a blowout win for Ford and his governing Progressive Conservatives, there are perfectly reasonable questions to be raised over whether removing a handful of bike lanes will help achieve the Premier’s goal of improving gridlock, or even if the province should weigh in on a matter that is usually left to municipalities. 

Article content

A moment for a caveat here: I support bike lanes. They help provide a safe, alternative means of transportation in areas that are increasingly jammed by vehicular traffic.

Article content

Cycle in places that have truly embraced them, as opposed to municipalities that paint a line on the side of the road and pat themselves on the back for their commitment to environmentalism, and you see how they can be transformative. Bike lanes, broadly speaking, are a net good.

Article content

But the place to stop Doug Ford from tearing up bike lanes was not in the courts, but at the ballot box. As the Appeal Court noted, provincial legislatures routinely pass laws that govern the use of the roads.

Article content

“The legislature is free to legislate to remove a bicycle lane from a road — indeed, it may remove a road entirely — without implicating the Charter,” the court found.