NP View: The censorship agenda motivated by the Kamloops ‘graves’ fiasco

A rock with the message "Every Child Matters" painted on it sits at a memorial outside the former Kamloops Indian Residential School, in Kamloops, B.C., on Thursday, July 15, 2021. Photo by THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

Article content

The discovery of underground anomalies at the site of the former Kamloops Indian Residential School in May 2021 offers a cautionary tale about how an assumed consensus, even one based on half-truths or misrepresentations, can lead to a climate of censorship.

Article content

On May 27, 2021, the Tk’emlúps te Secwe̓pemc First Nation shocked the world when it issued a press release claiming that the use of ground-penetrating radar had led to the “confirmation of the remains of 215 children who were students of the Kamloops Indian Residential School.”

Article content

Article content

Article content

The following day, the New York Times reported that a “mass grave containing the remains of 215 children on the grounds of a former residential school” had been discovered.

Article content

Article content

Two months later, Sarah Beaulieu, the researcher who performed the survey, clarified that, “With ground-penetrating radar we can never say definitively that they are human remains until you excavate … which is why we need to pull back a little bit and say that they are probable burials.”

Article content

But it was too late. In the weeks that followed the Kamloops announcement, a succession of other First Nations reported similar discoveries. Many of them were more careful to note that they had not found mass graves. Some were known gravesites where the wooden markings had degraded over time.

Article content

Nevertheless, the media and federal government continued to push the narrative that hundreds of bodies of dead Indigenous children had been found on the sites of former residential schools. The fallout was swift. Flags flew at half-mast. Canada Day celebrations were called off. And anyone who tried to have a reasoned conversation about residential schools was cancelled.

Article content

Article content

In December 2021, Frances Widdowson, a political science professor at Mount Royal University in Calgary, was fired, at least in part, for daring to suggest that residential schools had some educational benefits.

Article content

Article content

A high school teacher in Abbotsford, B.C., also landed in hot water that year for pointing out in class that most of the deaths at residential schools occurred due to disease, not abuse. It didn’t matter that his statement was true. He was let go two years later.

Article content

The facts about the graves story were brought to light, most thoroughly by National Post’s Terry Glavin a year after the story first broke, but the truth only seemed to add fuel to the censorship fire. In February 2024, NDP MP Leah Gazan called on Parliament to criminalize what was being termed “residential school denialism.”

Article content

A few months later, Kimberly Murray, the Trudeau government’s “special interlocutor for missing children and unmarked graves and burial sites associated with Indian residential schools,” released her interim report calling for legal remedies to combat denialism.

Article content

Gazan and Murray’s calls were both met with openness by Liberal cabinet ministers.