Marc-Olivier Fortin: The Parti Québécois cannot win a majority without putting separatism first

Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon waves to his supporters as he arrives at the National Assembly in Quebec City Wednesday September 9, 2026. Photo by Francis Vachon for Postmedia. Photo by Francis Vachon /Francis Vachon

Article content

For four years, Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon (PSPP) sharpened the spear of Quebec sovereignty. He told Quebecers the province was ready for a defining national moment. But when the election finally arrived, he left the spear in the tent.

Article content

After winning only three seats and not even 15 per cent of the vote in the 2022 Quebec election, many thought that PSPP was only a transitional PQ leader. However, not only did he stay on, but he worked consistently to put independence at the forefront of his agenda. That steady work paid off. At its peak, the party led the polls, reaching 38 per cent support, according to aggregator qc125.com in last December, 16 points ahead of their closest opponent.

Article content

Article content

Article content

But, ahead of Tuesday’s election debate, that lead is now slipping through his fingers. What looked like a certain majority government a few months ago has become a much more uncertain position.

Article content

Article content

In the lead-up to the election, PSPP has favored a big tent approach. While PQ leaders in the 21st century have been ideologically more left of centre, PSPP has been focusing his agenda on putting Quebec independence first and foremost, similar to what Lucien Bouchard and Jacques Parizeau did in the 1990s. For that, he knew he had to build a vast coalition of nationalists and bring more right-of-centre voters into the party’s coalition. In the years before the election, he has adopted policies that align with this line of thinking. From advocating for stricter immigration to denouncing wokeism, PSPP has pushed the party beyond the centre-left comfort zone it has occupied the last quarter century.

Article content

A staunch separatist, he has never shied away from defending his proposal to hold a referendum on Quebec independence in the first term of a PQ government. He was avoiding a critical mistake multiple PQ leaders have made in the past in moving away from their core raison d’être. PSPP’s immediate predecessor Jean-François Lisée pledged not to hold a referendum if elected. He won only 10 seats in 2018 and was forced to resign afterwards. In the 2012 election, former premier Pauline Marois pledged to hold a referendum only in a second term. All polls suggested that she was on track for a majority government, but on election day, she was held to a minority.

Article content

Article content

Bernard Landry followed a similar path in 2002. Elected on a sovereigntist mandate in 1998 with Bouchard, the PQ government spent years pursuing “winning conditions” rather than holding a third referendum many supporters expected. Landry, who took over the leadership before the end of the PQ’s term, proposed a 1,000-day timetable. He never came close to reaching it, losing power in 2003. Taken together, when PQ leaders allow sovereignty to become an afterthought, when it is their founding purpose, the base and core supporters tend to stay home.

Article content

Article content

And now, history appears to be rhyming once again.

Article content

PSPP spent four years convincing Quebecers that the province was ready for a rendezvous with history. However, right before the election campaign began, he argued that Quebec should wait until U.S. President Donald Trump leaves office before deciding its future. What he told Quebecers is that he does not believe in his own project enough to risk an election on it.

Article content

One can understand the temptation. On the campaign trail, voters are worried about Trump and the trade war. PSPP likely concluded that talking less about sovereignty when voters are looking for reassurance and stability would strengthen his chances of forming government. But great national projects have never been built on caution alone.