‘Associate member’ or ‘unique alliance,’ Carney jets to EU in search of new and deeper ties

Article content

“I think in fact he has to do that because, if the level of ambition is to be realized, and the bureaucracy has to to operationalize that both in Brussels and in Ottawa, you’ve got to talk fairly loudly,” Boehm said.

Article content

Carney will also use it to spell out to Canadians what the government’s intentions are vis-à-vis the EU.

Article content

That’s exactly what Marc Camilleri, the co-founder of the Canada EU-Trade and Investment Association, hopes to hear from Carney at the European Parliament.

Article content

“What I’d like to see is really this flushing out of this idea of what does it mean to be a trusted partner in this new world of of economic uncertainty,” he told National Post.

Article content

The last Canada-EU summit in June 2025 “reoriented” the relationship between both countries, Camilleri said. It set the stage for the deepening alliance and launched negotiations for Canada to become the only non-EU to join the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) agreement, a European defence procurement program.

Article content

What do we know as of now of Carney’s intentions for a deeper alliance with the EU, itself grappling with major issues such as mass migration, soaring energy costs, the looming threat of a Russian invasion and the rise of far-right populist parties?

Article content

Article content

On Saturday, the Wall Street Journal published an eye-popping scoop: Carney was seeking such a deep new alliance with the EU that there were talks of creating a new, “associate member” category for Canada.

Article content

Reaction online was swift, with some observers celebrating the novel move while critics, including Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, panned any talk of Canada becoming a member of the union.

Article content

“We will NEVER be the 51st U.S. state. And we will NEVER be the 28th EU state,” Poilievre wrote, accusing Carney once again of being out of touch.

Article content

Article content

Shortly after the Wall Street Journal report, the prime minister and his office swore up and down that talk of any form of EU membership is overblown.

Article content

“We’re not looking to become a member of the European Union,” Carney told quizzical reporters on the red carpet of Toronto’s International Film Festival (TIFF) Sunday evening.

Article content

“What we are looking, and will begin discussions for, (is) a unique alliance with the European Union,” he added.

Article content

Various sources say the idea of pushing for a new “associate member” position within the EU has been passed around the Prime Minister’s Office for months now, and even made its way briefly into the draft of at least one of his speeches in Europe this year. But with Carney’s comments at TIFF, that idea — or at least the branding — is likely dead.

Article content

Article content

So whether it’s as an “associate member,” a part of a “unique alliance” or a signatory to a “deeper” partnership with the EU, Carney promises that what is to come with the block of nations is “above and beyond” a trade deal.

Article content

Carney has spoken of increased collaboration on trade, energy, space, artificial intelligence, defence and improved mobility between Canada and the EU.

Article content

On the latter point, he’s specifically mentioned easing mobility for labour (facilitating workers’ movement between countries), students and researchers.

Article content

According to Boehm, that could mean that eventually Canadians are going through the same security gate at European airports as EU residents, for example.

Article content

But the possibility of increased labour mobility from the EU — a key irritant in the U.K.’s Brexit debate — raises hackles in Canada. For example, Conservatives said Carney “must be absolutely clear that he will not make matters worse by importing Europe’s immigration crisis.”

Article content

And what about full EU membership one day? On that, Boehm and Camilleri are categorical: no.

Article content

“Membership would not be in our our interest because of the tremendous regulatory burden that it would bring, and it would also circumscribe our ability to act in a sovereign way,” Boehm said.

Article content

National Post

Article content

[email protected]

Article content

Article content