Liberals water down police search powers bill during contentious overnight vote blitz

Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa June 16, 2026. Photo by Blair Gable /Postmedia

Article content

OTTAWA — While most Canadians slept, Liberals pushed through a series of changes watering down their controversial bill facilitating police and intelligence agencies’ ability to intercept and collect personal information.

Article content

Starting late Wednesday night and going into the early morning Thursday, members of the House of Commons public safety committee blitzed through amendments of the contentious lawful access reform Bill C-22.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Lawful access, or the ability to obtain Canadians’ private information and intercept communications, is one of the most intrusive powers afforded to police and intelligence agencies.

Article content

Article content

On Wednesday night, the committee passed all of two dozen government amendments to the bill, while the Liberals voted against and defeated most changes proposed by opposition parties.

Article content

The changes are likely to assuage some, but far from all, of the wide range of criticism of the bill by opposition parties, tech giants, privacy and civil liberties groups, legal associations and academics.

Article content

One of the most significant Liberal amendments was to water down a controversial requirement for electronic service providers to retain clients’ metadata from a maximum of one year to six months. It also limits the metadata retained to elements deemed essential to an investigation.

Article content

The move is notable because three weeks ago, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree told reporters he would not dilute the retention obligation, arguing police needed it because investigators sometimes need months to figure out what evidence they’re looking for.

Article content

Article content

The metadata retention clause had privacy and security specialists up in arms, arguing that one year was far too long and a violation of Canadians’ right to privacy. Police witnesses said they’d prefer a two- or three-year period.

Article content

Canada is the only G7 country without a lawful access regime designed in the digital age. Bill C-22 is the federal government’s ninth attempt at lawful access reform in over three decades and is divided into two parts.

Article content

The first — generally supported by all parties — proposes that police and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) be able to approach telecommunications companies and ask them if, yes or no, an individual is a client before having to get a warrant.

Article content

It then sets out a new path for authorities to obtain client information from the companies with the appropriate warrant.

Article content

The second part of C-22 is far more contentious.

Article content

It proposes new obligations to electronic service providers to organize and retain various types of client data in a way that makes it obtainable by law enforcement or CSIS with a warrant.

Article content

That means that if passed, the bill would compel electronic service providers to store and make information like device locations or cameras available to police or CSIS with the requisite warrant. That could be used to track a person’s live location in case they pose a threat to national security or are in danger, the government cited as examples.