Judge to decide if transgender woman with history of sex crimes should go to women’s jail

A watchtower stands on the edge of fencing at Millhaven Institution on Friday, Nov. 21, 2025. Photo by Meghan Balogh /The Kingston Whig-Standard

Article content

A judge has reserved a decision on whether a transgender inmate being held at a men’s prison, Amanda Cooper, should be moved to a women’s facility.

Article content

Cooper, 59, has a history of sexual offences against women in Quebec that date back to the 1980s. The crimes were committed when Cooper was living as a man. Cooper has been deemed a dangerous offender and is serving a third federal sentence after a 2001 conviction. While in prison, Cooper underwent gender surgery.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Lawyers argued virtually before federal court Justice Janet Fuhrer on Monday morning.

Article content

Article content

The case was taken to federal court for judicial review after Cooper was involuntarily transferred from one men’s institution to another, despite identifying as a woman.

Article content

Correctional Service Canada says the decision to move Cooper from Atlantic Institution in New Brunswick to Millhaven Institution in Ontario in 2025 was because of Cooper’s refusal to integrate into the prison population. Instead, Cooper remained in a Structured Intervention Unit (SIU), essentially in isolation, but that it was self-imposed, according to CSC.

Article content

It is the duty of CSC to mitigate SIU placement. The goal of SIU, as it is described by CSC, is for the offender to return to the inmate population “as soon as possible.” The agency said it had done its due diligence, offering Cooper many options.

Article content

CSC said the relationship between Cooper and the case management team had devolved, and therefore, decided to move Cooper to Millhaven, where there would be a new case management team and other suitable measures in place to avoid SIU.

Article content

Article content

Meanwhile, counsel for Cooper, Jessica Rose, told the court that there was a significant safety risk if Cooper were to be part of the general prison population due to the surgery. Cooper is a “woman with a vagina,” said Rose. There are also serious harms to health and well-being when a person remains in segregation, she said.

Article content

Article content

Rose also argued that if a man committed crimes against men, it would be “absurd” to conclude that the offender should be sent to a women’s prison to avoid being incarcerated with the type of people he has victimized in the past. She noted that inmates in women’s prisons also have histories of committing offences against women.

Article content

“Security and risk is CSC’s bread and butter,” said Rose. “That’s their expertise, and to say that they have no capacity to manage risk for this one particular individual… their decision doesn’t go far enough to explain why that should be the case for Ms. Cooper, but not for dangerous cisgender women who have a history of sexually victimizing women.”

Article content

CSC previously denied Cooper’s request to transfer to a women’s prison due to safety concerns for inmates and staff.