
Article content
The recent ramming through of amendments to Ontario’s provincial and local freedom of information legislation — as part of an omnibus budget bill 97 — will hit home right away, including in Ottawa.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Unlimited digital access to the Ottawa Citizen.
- Analysis on all things Ottawa by Bruce Deachman, Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, and others, award-winning newsletters and virtual events.
- Opportunity to engage with our commenting community.
- Ottawa Citizen ePaper.
- Ottawa Citizen App.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office.
- Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account.
- Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
- Support local journalism.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Register to unlock this article — it’s free
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
The exclusion of provincial records on matters from the Greenbelt exploitation to the premier’s cell phone records is very controversial.
Article content
Article content
But I would argue that the changes enacted are equally — if not more devastating — at the local level for users looking for records from city halls, police departments, schools or hospitals.
Article content
Article content
That’s because both the municipal and provincial acts want to force users into access plans that can require requests to undergo wording changes that agencies prefer — and if users disagree with those changes, the government can then unilaterally declare those requests as abandoned.
Article content
The amendments also mean more potential delay tactics, as bodies can dally around with FOI applications for up to 60 days, instead the previous 30-day time limit, and even then they can come back asking for more time to process the requests.
Article content
So, for instance, most (if not all) of my many FOI requests to the City of Ottawa on the initial LRT problems — that were featured in multiplestories in the Citizen — could now be subject to replies that effectively say “we do not like what you asked so we consider your request abandoned.”
Article content
There is a certain irony to this, as it was Ontario premier Doug Ford who called a rare public inquiry into the failings of Ottawa’s LRT, an inquiry that came up with more factual evidence and a damming public report.
Article content
Sadly, though, while being able to give a constructive presentation on the many faults of Ottawa’s LRT at that inquiry, I and others were prevented from presenting our objections to the Ford FOI amendments in front of a legislative committee.
Article content
Article content
The reality is that now all provincial ministers and parliamentary assistant records get to permanently exclude their records dating back to 1988.
Article content
Article content
This goes further than any other Canadian jurisdiction and means Ford (and future Premiers of Ontario) can hide the key decision-making records of the government and the lobbying and developer efforts his government receives with no chance of Information Commissioner reviews.
Article content
That means that I would now never get the records of auto insurance companies successfully lobbying his cabinet for higher rates that affected millions in Ontario. Nor would I have been able to have the Information Commissioner do reviews that agreed the withheld records could not be claimed as cabinet confidences.
Article content
I have so many documents via FOI requests that Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner Pat Kosseim e-mailed me saying I should seek legal assistance if any records I had obtained are now called into question.
Article content
I know how devastating that can be having been sued by a commercial company who did not like the wording or my requests for his company’s polling contracts in Ottawa, Durham, and Quebec City. After incurring $15,000 in legal expenses. I avoided becoming a party and being held liable for millions of dollars for the “libellous” action of filing routine contract requests.
.png)
2 hours ago
7

















Bengali (BD) ·
English (US) ·