Chris Selley: The PQ wins a reprieve from the humiliation of a losing referendum

Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon gives a victory speech following his win in the provincial election in Montreal on Monday, Oct. 5, 2026. Photo by Evan Buhler/Montreal Gazette/Postmedia

Article content

Premier-presumptive Paul St-Pierre Plamondon (PSPP) doubled down on his referendum promise Monday evening, despite winding up five seats short of a majority. “We will … not forget our commitment to consult Quebecers on their future,” he told supporters in downtown Montreal, “with, of course, the support, we hope, of other independentist MNAs from other parties who will make this … possible.”

Article content

Article content

In all but name, that was an appeal to the hard-left Québec Solidaire (QS) and its nine MNAs elected Monday night. QS supports sovereignty, but not a referendum, at least not now, preferring some kind of “constituents’ assembly,” “co-created with First Nations” (bonne chance!), that would instill a sort of provincewide progressive-sovereigntist vibe.

Article content

Article content

Article content

“It’s important to talk to people and to rally Quebecers around this project, because if you want to make a country of Quebec, it’s not against Canada,” QS co-leader Ruba Ghazal recently told the Gazette, talking sense. “And it will not be done only with two political parties in a closed office.”

Article content

Except that the Parti (and Bloc) Québécois’ modern version of separatism is absolutely anti-Canada. PSPP and federal Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet ooze antipathy toward Canada as a nation, not just as a home for Quebec. (Readers may recall Blanchet ruminating on Alberta separatism: “I am not certain that oil and gas qualifies to define a culture.”)

Article content

For one thing, the PQ intends to defund the lieutenant governor’s position, except for the purposes of signing bills — which is kind of funny, because they could just pass a law (probably unanimously) declaring third reading in the National Assembly to constitute royal assent, and no one in Ottawa would lift a finger to stop them. It’s not just the likes of outgoing premier Christine Fréchette and PSPP, who no longer swear an oath to the monarch, which is an unambiguous constitutional requirement (except it apparently no longer is). Quebec Liberal leader Charles Milliard didn’t swear the oath either.

Article content

Article content

PQ and QS partisans get along about as well as federal Liberals and New Democrats, but Ghazal waxed co-operative at a Tuesday press conference in Montreal. “Quebecers (have) decided that’s what they want: for us to work together.”

Article content

Article content

But then she said this: “When people are experiencing economic insecurity, it’s hard afterwards to say, ‘I’m going to rally to independence.’ That’s why I say we must listen first and foremost.”

Article content

That’s fine. But one of the things they’ll hear from the public, if they listen, is massive lack of support for sovereignty in any meaningful sense. That has a lot to do with the aforementioned “financial instability.” No politician can convince people living on the edge that things are better than they are.

Article content

PSPP may not realize it now, but I think winning a strong minority was the best thing that could have happened to him. Ultimately, it will give him an off-ramp from that very, very silly promise to hold a referendum in the next four years (but after U.S. President Donald Trump leaves office). At some point along the way, with a majority, he would realize it would certainly fail, as every poll for 20 years has resoundingly shown, and he’d be left looking a bit of a boob. Huge political capital expended for naught. (Not holding the referendum has risks as well, with respect to the party base, but the party base doesn’t want to lose a referendum either.)