Warren Mirko: Not helpful for B.C. Indigenous leader to declare ‘war’ on common sense policies

Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs Photo by Scott McAlpine /UBCM

Article content

As the incoming B.C. Conservative government prepares to deliver on its promise to repeal the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA), Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, stated this week that doing so would be a “declaration of war.”

Article content

After an election in which competing positions were openly debated and voters knew what was at stake, any talk of war is wholly unnecessary and provocative. Concerns over DRIPA did not suddenly emerge with the selection of a new government. Even outgoing premier David Eby acknowledged the serious legal uncertainty it created, proposing amending or even suspending the legislation before retreating in the face of opposition from First Nations leaders and his own caucus.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Premier-elect Lorne Doerkson was unambiguous throughout the election campaign that repealing DRIPA was a top priority, while also reaffirming that he is “completely committed to working with First Nations.”

Article content

Article content

Phillip can oppose repeal, but suggesting that British Columbia could become a battleground over a legislative decision he opposes only serves to stifle public debate. B.C. Green Leader Emily Lowan recently reinforced this narrative by linking Conservative efforts to repeal DRIPA with anti-Indigenous racism.

Article content

Their approach fosters the mistaken impression that DRIPA is somehow necessary to protect Aboriginal rights. It isn’t. Opposition to the legislation should not be conflated with opposition to Aboriginal rights.

Article content

As Aboriginal law expert Tom Isaac recently explained on CBC’s “B.C. Today,” Aboriginal rights do not flow from the declaration. They are recognized and protected under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, regardless of whether DRIPA remains in force. Isaac has also described Canada’s legal framework as the world’s leading system for protecting Indigenous rights against unilateral government action.

Article content

Article content

Several Indigenous leaders have openly challenged the confrontational rhetoric surrounding DRIPA and questioned whether it reflects the views of their communities.

Article content

Article content

Chris Sankey, an Indigenous business leader and former elected councillor of the Lax Kw’alaams Band, addressed Phillip, B.C. Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief Terry Teegee and Heiltsuk Chief Marilyn Slett, writing: “You do not represent the vast majority of our communities.” He argued that their comments have hurt reconciliation and damaged relationships with other British Columbians.

Article content

Chawathil First Nation Chief Aaron Pete was unequivocal in his response to Phillip: “It is not a declaration of war.” He called such language “irresponsible, dangerous and not productive in the least,” adding that legislation must reflect the expectations of voters, as “that’s how democracy works.”

Article content

Former Haisla chief and now federal MP Ellis Ross, who originally voted for the legislation, later acknowledged: “I thought it was harmless, and I was wrong.” Responding to Phillip’s latest remarks, Ross called for an end to the divisive politics, warning that ordinary people are “paying the price.”