Rob Breakenridge: Come clean on the bridge deal, Mr. Carney

Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to journalists about U.S. President Donald Trump's new 50% tariff threat in the Parliamentary Precinct in Ottawa July 21, 2026. Photo by Blair Gable/Postmedia Photo by Blair Gable /Photo by Blair Gable / Postmedia

Article content

Ten days after word of the deal was first announced, the details of the Gordie Howe International Bridge revenue-sharing agreement between Canada and the U.S. have finally emerged.

Article content

That’s at least nine days longer than otherwise should have been the case, but clearly those details were going to emerge at some point. So why on earth was the prime minister making claims about the deal that would inevitably be disproven and discredited?

Article content

Article content

Article content

When it comes to dealing with a mercurial and belligerent U.S. president, Mark Carney still enjoys a fair amount of leeway and benefit of the doubt from the Canadian public. Given the importance of opening this new bridge, coupled with Trump’s abrupt intervention to block that opening, Canadians would likely have been in a forgiving mood for a compromise deal.

Article content

Article content

Under the circumstances, this may well have been the best way forward. But instead of the prime minister levelling with Canadians, we got dishonesty, obfuscation, and a heaping of Trump-like spin.

Article content

It was Tuesday evening when the particulars of this agreement were quietly posted to the Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority. That alone is telling, since a truly favourable deal for Canada would have been heralded and publicized much sooner and much more widely.

Article content

To be sure, the Americans weren’t exactly shy when it came to boasting about this agreement and what they were able to extract from Canada to facilitate the opening of the bridge.

Article content

The full text would seem to confirm the American’ claims as well as the earlier reporting which had indicated a conflict between the agreement’s actual details and what Carney was saying publicly. Of course, what Carney was saying publicly also shifted over the span of those ten days.

Article content

Article content

This is all separate from the original Canada-Michigan bridge deal. Under that agreement, Canada would pay the full $6.4 billion cost of the bridge, and then collect the tolls until that debt was paid off. Afterwards, the toll revenue would be split with Michigan.

Article content

Article content

As per this new agreement with the United States, Canada will hand over 50 per cent of net revenues for the first 15 years, after recovering operating costs. That money will go into a fund, which will be controlled by the U.S. government.

Article content

Two days after that deal was reached, Carney told CTV News that the revenue sharing would only come after Canada’s debt-servicing costs had been factored in. In actuality, the details posted on Tuesday make no mention of Canada recouping such costs.

Article content

“We are sharing after Canada is paid back,” Carney insisted at the time. “We get the revenues. Then the servicing of the costs of the bridge and paying the debt of the bridge, and then what’s left over, there’s a split of that for 15 years.”

Article content

His comments in the subsequent days were less clear about that point, which only added to the uncertainty and confusion around the agreement.