OPINION: Infrastructure must be a top issue in Ontario’s upcoming municipal elections 

So much depends on municipal infrastructure, including the provision of new housing. Photo by Shutterstock

Article content

Municipal infrastructure is the backbone that supports the living fabric of our communities. 

Article content

Our economic, social and cultural well-being and prosperity is contingent on the functioning of the pipes in the ground, the wires overhead, the roads, transit and services we use to meet the needs and demands of present and future residents. 

Article content

Article content

In the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), we are fortunate to turn on the tap and have access to clean, safe fresh water. We are able to plug in our fans and reliable electricity powers it, we generally have access to efficient and affordable transit, we flush the toilet and the wastewater is whisked away to be safely treated. 

Article content

Article content

So much depends on municipal infrastructure – including the provision of new housing, as after all, you cannot build a new home if you are unable to turn on the tap in that home, or flush the toilet. 

Article content

While not the most illustrious topic, how and when we build infrastructure and how it is funded must be one of the top issues in October’s Ontario municipal election.  

Article content

As citizens, so much of our everyday lives depend on the smooth functioning of municipal infrastructure. It only takes it not working, to be reminded of its significance once more.  

Article content

What people may not be aware of is how municipal infrastructure, or the lack thereof, impacts the supply and affordability of new homes.  

Article content

Across the GTA, there are countless examples of projects that cannot proceed or are facing delays because there is insufficient infrastructure capacity.  

Article content

We have an unfortunate track record in the GTA of investing in municipal infrastructure in fits and starts. We plan, fund and build much-needed infrastructure and celebrate the projects, and then stop building for a protracted period of time.  

Article content

Then, after a decade or two, we again find ourselves at the beginning of the infrastructure journey – we have a crisis, are in an infrastructure deficit, and then plan, fund and build once more. Afterwards, we once again celebrate the projects and then stop building.  

Article content

Article content

There are three challenges with this approach. 

Article content

First, this pattern becomes very expensive – municipalities have to deal with pent up infrastructure issues which means they are paying for yesterday’s costs, at present-day prices and with only tomorrow’s revenues to look forward to.   

Article content

Second, a disproportionate amount of the infrastructure cost invariably gets added to the cost of new development (both housing and commercial). This drives up the cost of these new buildings and either makes new housing more expensive, or new retail, industrial and commercial buildings more expensive. This ultimately undercuts the competitiveness of the region.  

Article content

And finally, this pattern of stopping and starting infrastructure building, creates disruption that impacts the provision of new housing and other forms of buildings. The instability and uncertainty that this creates discourages investment in the sector. 

Article content

This ultimately limits the supply of new housing and drives up costs and affects housing affordability.  

Article content

In this upcoming election, it is time we have a serious discussion about infrastructure – one that will lead us away from the “fits and starts approach,” towards a new system where we are continually assessing the infrastructure needs of the GTA.