Nova Scotia court strikes down summer ‘hiking ban’

Jeffrey Evely shows the fine he received for walking in the woods after the Nova Scotia government banned any travel or activities in the woods due to extremely dry conditions. Jeffrey Evely / Facebook

Article content

OTTAWA — Nova Scotia’s highest trial court has struck down the province’s sweeping summer 2025 ban on entering the woods.

Article content

Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice Jamie S. Campbell found in a decision released on Friday that the wildfire season activity restrictions unduly limited the Charter-protected mobility rights of Nova Scotians to “move freely around the province.”

Article content

Article content

Article content

Campbell said in a 17-page decision that there was no evidence of forethought of how the ban would affect the Charter rights of Nova Scotians, making it impermissible on administrative grounds.

Article content

“There was no evidence in the record… there was any consideration given to mobility rights, how the ban could limit those rights and how the ban could be drafted in a way to to minimize (those) limitations,” wrote Campbell. “As a matter of administrative law, the travel ban was unreasonable.”

Article content

Campbell qualified that his objection was to the way the ban was proclaimed, not necessarily the ban itself.

Article content

“A travel ban in the woods may have been an entirely justifiable limitation on mobility rights given the extraordinary circumstances that presented themselves in the summer of 2025,” he wrote. “But the Minister had to have considered that before the proclamation was issued.”

Article content

Nova Scotia Natural Resources Minister Tory Rushton placed extensive restrictions on travel and recreation in wooded areas on Aug. 5, after weeks of dry, hot weather created an extreme wildfire risk. The near-total ban made the woods off-limits for hiking, trail running, camping and other recreational activities. The ban was mostly lifted in Sep. 18 with some areas remaining closed until Oct. 15.

Article content

Article content

Premier Tim Houston announced the same day that the penalty for violating the order would be $25,000.

Article content

Article content

Evely was one of the plaintiffs in Friday’s decision, joined by civil rights group the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF).

Article content

Campbell also criticized the government for not communicating more clearly which areas and activities were off limits.

Article content

“The case has been decided on other grounds. Had it not been, there is a compelling argument that the ban was so vague as to be incapable of being interpreted at all,” wrote Campbell.

Article content

The ruling didn’t direct the government to take any action, since the order has already expired.

Article content

JCCF litigation director Marty Moore said the ruling reaffirms governments must respect personal freedoms, even during emergencies. The organization also expected the decision to lead to Evely’s fine being invalidated.

Article content

“We hope this judicial rebuke will lead to more reasonable decisions by the government of Nova Scotia in the future,” said Moore.

Article content

Inquiries to Rushton and the premier’s office weren’t immediately returned.

Article content

National Post
[email protected]

Article content

Article content