Nigerian woman dodges deportation due to fears of being made a mistress

Entrance to a Federal Court of Canada courtroom. Photo by HYUNGCHEOL PARK/Postmedia

Article content

A Nigerian woman has managed to stave off deportation from Canada by arguing that she feared a powerful businessman in her homeland who wanted to make her his mistress.

Article content

Amina E-Osmund Ekpo was slated to report for removal from Canada earlier this week. But a Federal Court judge granted her an urgent stay Tuesday while the 47-year-old waits to see if another judge will grant a review of an immigration officer’s refusal to give Ekpo a pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA) — her last-ditch bid to stay in Canada.

Article content

Article content

Article content

“She had alleged to fear a powerful businessman who was interested in her to become his mistress,” Justice Negar Azmudeh wrote in a June 16 decision.

Article content

Article content

“The businessman was well-connected and was using the state machinery, including the courts, to issue baseless summons or evict her from her apartment to ultimately force her into submissions.”

Article content

Lawyers for Immigration Minister Lena Diab recommended the court reject Ekpo’s “unnecessarily long” argument, said the judge. “However, given the high stakes of an urgent stay motion, it is not in the interest of justice for this court to give more weight to form over substance,” Azmudeh said.

Article content

Ekpo “was ineligible to plead her refugee case before the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada but was able to apply for a PRRA,” said the judge.

Article content

The judge found “that there is a serious issue in this case,” said her decision.

Article content

“It appears that the officer accepted the applicant’s allegation to be credible but rejected the claim on the basis of the lack of corroborative evidence.”

Article content

Azmudeh agreed with Diab’s lawyers that “the onus is always on a refugee claimant to prove their claim.”

Article content

Article content

The judge cited another decision from the Federal Court of Appeal that “stated that when a claimant swears that certain facts are true, this creates a presumption that they are true unless there is valid reason to doubt their truthfulness.”

Article content

Article content

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’ Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status notes “there is no general requirement for a claimant to provide corroborating documents,” said the judge.

Article content

“This is because a refugee may have been forced to flee their home on little or no notice, taking little or nothing with them, and such circumstances of flight render it impossible or unreasonable to expect them to provide supporting documentary evidence.”

Article content

Requiring corroboration without explaining why Ekpo’s evidence lacked credibility “would effectively reverse the presumption” that she was telling the truth, said the judge.

Article content

“Alone, the absence of corroborating evidence cannot ground an adverse credibility finding,” Azmudeh said.

Article content

“An adverse finding against credibility must first find that independent reasons exist to doubt an applicant’s claim, and the board must then consider absence of corroboration as a reason to doubt a claim’s credibility.”