Kate Marland: Tearing down B.C. Human Rights Tribunal should be only the start

B.C. Human Rights Tribunal / file photo Vancouver Sun

Article content

We are now well into the swing of David Eby’s faux-pas snap election. The candidates have been confirmed, battle lines have been drawn, and scores of scurrying volunteers are zipping door to door, eager to convince British Columbians that either the time is now for change, or the time is now to maintain the brilliant status quo.

Article content

At the moment, the B.C. Conservatives have yet to release a full platform. But if early polls are to be trusted, it seems like Lorne Doerkson’s hastily assembled coalition of the willing is poised to potentially rise like a phoenix from the ashes and form government. So the question becomes, how should a newly formed B.C. Conservative government wield their authority to defend free speech on the West Coast? (Note: David Eby, if you are reading this, these ideas are free for the taking).

Article content

Article content

Article content

First on the docket: eradicate the B.C. Human Rights regime of terror and its unstoppable commitment to distorting reality. The inimitable Amy Hamm has written at length in these pages on the subject of the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal, including last week with an impassioned plea to Doerkson to save us from “this star chamber’s far left ideologues.”

Article content

Article content

Not only is the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal routinely the horror of our national news cycle, but its twisted rulings have breached containment to make international news, as in the case of the individual, “Jessica Yaniv,” who lodged several complaints against a beauty salon for refusing to wax testicles. Let us not forget that this is the same institution that has established precedent that the use of “you people” can be discriminatory.

Article content

It bears constant reminding that our Human Rights overlords fined an elected school trustee $750,000 for remarks made about sexual orientation and gender ideology. Some amongst us would endeavour to reform this institution, but those would be individuals with far more institutional trust than me. I do not see a path forward for reform when we have done a cannonball off the deep end.

Article content

Article content

Luckily, the proposition to abolish the tribunal is not an extreme position. Saskatchewan abolished its human rights tribunal in 2011, placing the majority of case management with its human rights commission and sending cases that could not be settled to the Court of King’s Bench.

Article content

B.C. has also made major reforms to its human rights regime in the past. In 1983, Premier Bill Bennett abolished the B.C. Human Rights Commission in a slash-and-burn move, part of a massive budget overhaul that found its employees on the streets the very same day. The Free Speech Union has been calling for these tribunals to be abolished for months.

Article content

A B.C. Conservative government must also prioritize passing a law similar in spirit to Alberta’s Regulated Professions Neutrality Act, dubbed “Peterson’s Law.” Peterson’s Law protects off-duty expression, ensuring overzealous regulators cannot discipline professionals for statements made outside of the performance of their regulated profession. The law also prevents regulators from mandating diversity, equity and inclusion education or training.