J.D. Tuccille: AI execs don’t want safety. They want to block competitors

Article content

“Competition was unacceptable to many key business and financial interests,” the late leftist historian Gabriel Kolko concluded in his book, The Triumph of Conservatism. “As new competition sprang up, and as economic power was diffused throughout an expanding nation, it became apparent to many important businessmen that only the national government could rationalize the economy.”

Article content

Calton added that “(t)he corporatist state reached its apex during the New Deal, when President Franklin Roosevelt invited executives from the nation’s largest companies to Washington to draft their own protectionist regulations under the ultimately unconstitutional National Industrial Recovery Act. Mammoth corporations were in a better position to absorb regulatory costs than their competitors, and price controls made it impossible for smaller operations to undercut them.”

Article content

In 2009, for the Foundation for Economic Education, historian Burton W. Folsom detailed how the New Deal and its National Recovery Administration (NRA) sided with cartelized businesses against small competitors (and against some independent-minded large ones, like the Ford Motor Company). In Jersey City, New Jersey, Jacob Maged, a tailor, was arrested for charging $0.35 to press a suit when regulators wanted him to charge $0.40. “Not only was Maged thrown in jail, he was also slapped with a $100 fine.” (That’s over $2,400 in modern money).

Article content

Article content

Folsom added that “(n)o merchants wanted to pay fines or go to jail, but the more than 500 NRA codes often imposed such quirky regulations that it was hard for many to comply.“

Article content

That is, it’s hard for small start-ups to stay within the law. It’s easier for a large, established company with platoons of lawyers and relationships with government bureaucrats to comply with red tape.

Article content

Amodei’s call for regulation implicitly acknowledges the challenge he sees from competition as he argues that AI poses risks and then warns of “a race to the bottom, spurred by commercial incentives.” In fact, many economists and regulatory experts saw this moment coming.

Article content

“The unfortunate iron law that industry generally prefers regulation that advances its interests and walls out competition will prove true of AI regulation specifically,” the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Clyde Wayne Crews predicted in 2020. “(E)stablished players — especially given the head start of the government contracting and military presence in AI — will appreciate federal approaches that just so happen to forestall those nettlesome upstarts with a different idea, even when those new ideas advance safety or accountability.”

Article content

Article content

Amodei and company’s call for AI regulation risks not just smothering entrepreneurs but also hobbling the free world. Alleged fear of AI and calls to “slow the pace” of development are peculiar fixations of the West that aren’t necessarily shared elsewhere.

Article content

“Unlike in the United States, no one in China seems to be openly fretting over the prospect of humanity being destroyed by artificial intelligence soon,” CNN’s John Liu reported last month. “The wide adoption of AI in today’s China underscores the country’s embrace of the novel technology.”

Article content

AI executives will, undoubtedly, continue to peddle scare stories as they call for government to save us from their own companies and products. But they’re almost certainly less concerned about dangers to humanity than they are about threats to their market share.

Article content

National Post

Article content