John Ivison: Exhibit A for why Canadians are losing faith in the justice system

Bill C-14 was introduced because the public was outraged by what it viewed as the government’s catch-and-release bail and sentencing provisions that prioritized the rights of criminals over the needs of vulnerable Canadians, John Ivison writes. Photo by Adobe Stock

Article content

Loath as I am to undermine public confidence in our institutions, the alleged shooting rampage by 25-year-old Brampton resident Omar Abdul Singateh last weekend offers a good example why so many Canadians have lost patience with the legal system.

Article content

Singateh was arrested in Toronto in the early hours of Sunday morning, after an exchange of gunfire near the Rebel nightclub on Toronto’s waterfront that led to him stealing a rideshare car containing four passengers, and subsequently striking pedestrians. Two people, including the accused, were transferred to hospital with non-life-threatening gunshot wounds.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Singateh was charged with discharging a firearm, unauthorized possession of a firearm, possessing a firearm while prohibited, robbery, and four counts of forcible confinement.

Article content

Article content

As the firearm prohibition suggests, he was no novice in terms of close encounters with law enforcement.

Article content

It has emerged that he was awaiting sentencing, after pleading guilty in May to driving from his home in Brampton to Montreal, where he and two accomplices beat and tortured a man until he gave them $15,000 in cryptocurrency.

Article content

According to evidence filed in a Montreal courtroom, Singateh beat the man with a barbell and broke his fingers at the behest of an unknown man who he contacted via the Signal app.

Article content

“Time to do a little torture,” the anonymous man said.

Article content

Singateh was subsequently arrested and pleaded guilty to unlawful confinement, breaking and entering, armed robbery and assault and causing bodily harm.

Article content

He was released on bail and scheduled to appear in court in October for sentencing.

Article content

Apparently unbeknownst to the judge in Montreal, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida named Singateh as a member of a five-man smuggling ring that moved 100 guns into Canada. The indictment says the five individuals, at least three of whom reside in Canada, trafficked the guns from Florida to Canada in 2023 and 2024. Twenty-nine firearms were subsequently recovered from Canadian crime scenes.

Article content

Article content

I say “apparently unbeknownst” because any judge who had granted bail and subsequently found out about the U.S. indictment should immediately have contacted the office of the Crown attorney and requested Singateh be brought before the court to make the case for why he shouldn’t be placed in custody.

Article content

Article content

Yet, even on the merits of the Montreal case, it is inexplicable to me how any judge could leave Singateh at liberty after viewing the grisly evidence (much of which appeared in the Journal de Montréal).

Article content

“This is an embarrassing case,” said one retired judge I spoke with.

Article content

Singateh’s bail conditions are a matter of public record: he was on the hook to pay $3,000 if he failed to comply with the conditions and he had to surrender his passport. He was obliged to remain at home in Brampton between the hours of 9 p.m. and 6 a.m.; not communicate with a number of associates; wear an ankle bracelet; and not carry any weapons.

Article content

Given we know he was caught with a banned gun last weekend, you can imagine there were other violations of the provisions in the release order signed by Court of Quebec judge Nathalie Fafard.