Jamie Sarkonak: Good on Liberals for calling off HIV decriminalization review

2 weeks ago 16

The answer to rising infection rates is not a looser approach to the law

Get the latest from Jamie Sarkonak straight to your inbox

Published Dec 26, 2024  •  Last updated 6 minutes ago  •  4 minute read

HIV preventionA woman looks at one of the scarves tied to the Halifax Public Gardens fence placed there by the AIDS Coalition of Nova Scotia on Dec. 1, 2023. Photo by Ryan Taplin /Saltwire

There was a time when HIV was a death sentence. Nowadays, it’s a life sentence of antiretroviral medication. Which is why the Liberals, since 2016, have been thinking of softening the law on HIV non-disclosure.

That is, until the end of November, when Justice Minister Arif Virani’s office confirmed to the Star that no reforms were on the way. It’s a blow to the longtime efforts of HIV advocacy groups who have some valid concerns about the law, but it’s probably for the best.

Advertisement 2

National Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Article content

The law as it stands now requires people with HIV with a “realistic possibility of transmission” to disclose their status to their sexual partners. It’s a matter of giving proper consent: if a person is about to engage in potentially risky sexual behaviour, they should be aware so they can make an informed choice whether to continue. No HIV disclosure, no consent — and consentless sex is how one winds up with a sexual assault charge, and possibly an aggravated sexual assault charge.

Those with HIV do not need to tell their partners about their status, however, if they use condoms during sex and have a low or undetectable viral load. Transmission risk in those cases is low enough that disclosure isn’t required, so said the Supreme Court of Canada in 2012.

HIV advocates have insisted that the law as it stands is still unfair, and the Liberals, for a while, were willing to hear them out. The HIV Legal Network calls the status quo a “misuse of the criminal law“ and says that low-risk, HIV-positive individuals are still being unfairly prosecuted under the existing rules.

The Canadian Coalition to Reform HIV Criminalization has a list of reform asks which include a call for criminal charges to not apply to HIV-positive individuals who don’t understand how the virus is transmitted. That is, ignorance as a defence. It also wants to see HIV non-disclosure be treated as a non-sexual offence, and hopes to end the practice of deporting non-citizens with HIV-related convictions.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

Put another way, these groups are asking for fewer guardrails at a time when HIV is blazing through Canada at far greater rates than before. In Alberta, the number of new, reported annual infections once hovered at 200 to 300 per year, but shot up to 500 in 2023. Immigration and drug use are likely factors driving the increase. The same period saw a 120 per cent infection increase in Montreal, where immigration was the dominant cause. It makes sense; Canada is a good place to settle if one has a lifelong, expensive-to-treat viral infection — which is likely why at least 251 people, 15 per cent of attendees at a Montreal AIDS conference last year, claimed asylum.

The answer to all this is not a looser approach to the law.

To the disappointment of advocacy groups, decriminalization has only inched along in recent years: in 2017, Ontario prosecutors were directed to not prosecute HIV non-disclosers who are on antiretrovirals and have kept viral levels low for six months at minimum. In 2018, the feds gave a similar instruction to federal prosecutors. The next year, B.C. set a viral load threshold for prosecution. Frustration with this is understandable, as patchwork rules are often confusing to the general public.

Advertisement 4

Article content

Ottawa began taking the temperature for further changes in 2022, with the release of the Liberals’ LGBT action plan. The feds committed to consulting the public on “limiting prosecutions of persons who fail to disclose their HIV status before otherwise consensual sexual activity.” Which wasn’t much of a commitment, but to their credit, they followed through with an online public consultation.

The consultation results, released in 2023, found that of the 980 respondents who opted in, which included individuals and organizations and other professionals, 85 per cent didn’t think HIV non-disclosure should count as a sexual assault. Fifty per cent believed that cases of HIV non-disclosure should be sanctioned by the Criminal Code only if the accused intended to transmit the virus. Similarly, 43 per cent of respondents wanted the Criminal Code to apply only to cases where HIV was actually transmitted — which would excuse reckless and dangerous instances of exposure that didn’t infect anyone new.

Some respondents — just over one-quarter, estimated the government — indicated in their written responses that they wanted to see total decriminalization of any HIV-related crime. It’s an extreme position, as it would give HIV spreaders fully aware of their infection the freedom to infect as they please, condemning unaware partners to a life of medication. Unfortunately, such people do exist, and we’re very wise to have laws that work to stop them.

Advertisement 5

Article content

Less than one per cent were opposed to changing the existing law, primarily because the law in their view was already reasonable. Their sentiments, which were consistent with the position of Conservative MPs studying the matter in the House of Commons back in 2019, are probably much closer to that of the general population.

Peruse the comments section under any news story about Canadian cases of HIV non-disclosure and you’ll find loads of people bristling at the idea of taking more guardrails off. Indeed, they seem to want more: low viral load or not, people generally believe that they should have fair warning if they’re about to expose themselves to infection — even in cases where the odds of transmission are sliver-thin.

Now is probably not the time for change. Advocates will always want more, but in a time where HIV is on the rise, we’re best off keeping the rules as they are. For once, the Liberals made the right call.

National Post

Recommended from Editorial

  1. Justice Minister and Attorney General David Lametti rises during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday, June 20, 2022. Lametti announced Wednesday that the Liberal government will launch consultations this October on the criminal justice system's response to HIV non-disclosure.

    Liberals to launch consultations on criminal justice response to HIV non-disclosure

  2. Wilson-Raybould raises criminalization of HIV non-disclosure with counterparts

Article content

Get the latest from Jamie Sarkonak straight to your inbox

*** Disclaimer: This Article is auto-aggregated by a Rss Api Program and has not been created or edited by Bdtype.

(Note: This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News Rss Api. News.bdtype.com Staff may not have modified or edited the content body.

Please visit the Source Website that deserves the credit and responsibility for creating this content.)

Watch Live | Source Article