Vaughn Palmer: B.C. NDP faces potential $5-billion divide in nurses' mediation

Nurses on the picket lines in front of Vancouver General Hospital in Vancouver on July 7, 2026. Photo by Arlen Redekop /PNG

Article content

VICTORIA — Nurses Union President Adriane Gear reduced the prospects for settlement to a single sentence when responding to the government appointment of special mediators in the dispute.

Article content

“We are cautiously optimistic that there’s been this appointment. However, it does give me pause that there’s not been any word on expanding the mandate so that we can get a deal,” she said Sunday. On Monday, the union called off its planned picketing as a sign of good faith as the mediation talks began.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Expanding the mandate: Shorthand for the nurses wanting more — much more — than the NDP cabinet-approved “balanced” mandate in the current round of public sector bargaining.

Article content

Article content

Gear and her union have not made public the demand they presented to government negotiators last week.

Article content

But I understand it was more than double the 12 per cent over four years that has already been accepted by unions representing about three quarters of the workforce in the provincial public sector.

Article content

No wonder Gear declared an impasse in the talks after the government refused to budge on the mandate. No wonder the government appointed special mediators Vince Ready and Amanda Rogers just eight days into the strike.

Article content

Veteran B.C. labour mediator Vince Ready. Photo by B.C. Labour Heritage Centre

Article content

Last year, the government let the BCGEU strike drag on for seven weeks before appointing the same duo to sort it out.

Article content

Despite their essential-services designation, the nurses, with their critical role in delivering health services, have more leverage than the workers in central government, whose biggest pressure point was the liquor distribution warehouse.

Article content

A larger factor this time was the irreconcilable gap at the bargaining table. The New Democrats and the nurses were so far apart, there was zero chance of progress in face-to-face negotiations.

Article content

Article content

Even if the New Democrats wanted to violate their own mandate for a group that the premier himself described as “the most beloved among all the professions,” they could not do so without springing a trap on themselves with massive financial consequences.

Article content

Article content

Unions that settle early in a bargaining round often secure an insurance clause that says they will get an equivalent top up if government exceeds its own mandate in later settlements.

Article content

Those “me-too” clauses used to allow some manoeuvring room for side deals.

Article content

In the last bargaining round before this one, the government used the leeway to provide the nurses with several percentage points more than other public sector unions. The other unions settled in the range of 14 per cent over three years. The nurses, by one internal reckoning, got more like 18 or 19 per cent all in.

Article content

This time around, the me-too clauses are tighter, leaving no room for fudging.

Article content

The government estimates that a one-point increase in wages and benefits across the entire public sector costs out at about $440 million a year.

Article content

Supposing the nurses were to get 25 per cent over four years — and I believe the union demanded more than that last week — the additional 13 points, when extended across the public sector, would cost $5 billion to $6 billion.