Stevie Wonder’s Ex Responds To Eviction Lawsuit With A List Of Requests

Ron Sachs - CNP for NY Post / MEGA

Stevie Wonder‘s eviction dispute with his former fiancée, Carmen Efferson, is no longer just about who gets to stay in the property. In her formal response to the singer’s lawsuit, she has drawn attention to the home’s alleged condition and asked the court to require Wonder to make repairs, among other things. Her filing offers a different perspective on the dispute and adds another issue for the court to consider.

Carmen Efferson Accuses Stevie Wonder Of Breaching Warranty Of Habitability

Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post / MEGA

Stevie Wonder is seeking to evict her former fiancée, Carmen Efferson, from his Los Angeles property where she has lived since 1988. The singer claims they had a verbal agreement allowing her to live in the home rent-free, but she refused to allow insurance inspectors access to the home despite giving her several chances.

On November 3, Efferson filed a response, alleging that the singer breached the warranty of habitability, the principle that requires landlords to ensure a residential property remains habitable for tenants. It’s an implied doctrine that does not need to be explicitly stated in a lease agreement.

As claimed in Efferson’s filing, per Rolling Stone, the home has leaking walls and ceilings, holes in walls and floors, peeling paint, and plumbing issues, among other complaints. She asked the court to order the singer to pay for the repairs, in addition to reducing her rent to a “reasonable rental value.”

The Singer’s Ex Requests The Judge To Deny The Eviction Request

In addition to requesting repairs and a reduction in rent, Efferson is also asking Wonder to cover her legal expenses. She further disputes his claim that she has been living at the property rent-free, claiming she has made rental payments or “provided other nonmonetary consideration or services in exchange for the right to occupy the premises.”

Efferson contested the property’s title, alleging that Wonder doesn’t have ownership of the home. According to her, the singer verbally promised that the home was hers when they made the verbal agreement.

She is asking the judge to deny Wonder’s eviction request and allow her to remain in the property, where she currently resides.

• Stevie Wonder used his platform to deliver a message to world leaders.
• Shaquille O’Neal once questioned the singer’s blindness after an elevator encounter.
• Jeff Ross wants Stevie Wonder to be the next target for a Netflix roast.

Stevie Wonder’s Attorneys Attempted To Access The Home Multiple Times

MEGA

According to Wonder’s lawsuit, filed on October 22, his team coordinated with Efferson about a scheduled inspection for updating and renewing the property’s insurance policy.

Efferson reportedly refused access to the property, sending email responses that were hostile and used profane language. She also accused one of Wonder’s lawyers of being racist. She explicitly stated that she won’t allow access to the home and threatened to alert law enforcement if they continue their attempts.

Wonder’s legal team sent an eviction notice in July, giving her 30 days to vacate the property. However, she remained in the home, prompting the singer’s attorneys to issue another notice in October and giving her three days to leave. When Efferson still did not comply, Wonder proceeded with a formal eviction lawsuit.

Carmen Efferson Says The Music Icon Is A Gaslighter

Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post / MEGA

Before filing a formal response to the lawsuit, Efferson shared the terms of her verbal agreement with Wonder in an interview with The Daily Mail.

The two were engaged in the ’80s, and she became pregnant with his child but miscarried. At that time, she was living in the home she currently occupies, which he claims the singer gave her. She initially refused, but said Wonder “kept insisting.”

“I never asked for a house. But we came to an agreement, a verbal one, that this would be my house,” she said. They parted ways shortly after when she found out Wonder had proposed to another woman. She was peacefully living in the home until the lawsuit was filed.

“Nobody wants to say this, but I know that he is a gaslighter and a manipulator,” Efferson said. An insider close to Wonder claimed that the lawsuit wasn’t a personal attack against Efferson, but it was an issue of safety. “He simply wants to ensure that the property, and therefore the entire block, is safe,” the source said.

Experts Weigh In On The Eviction Case

Mirrorpix / MEGA

Legal experts describe Wonder’s eviction case as complicated due to the lack of a written agreement. A formal document outlining terms would be helpful in establishing the rights and obligations of each side in case of a dispute. Without written terms, arguments could be contested with other evidence, such as emails, texts, and other forms of communication.

Despite Wonder’s claim that Efferson has not paid rent during her time living at the property, California law states that a person living rent-free may be considered a tenant and establish rights if they stay for an extended period of time.

Ultimately, the outcome of the case may depend on how the court interprets each side’s arguments and whether their submitted evidence supports their claims.