Premiers need to give leeway for feds to negotiate hard with Trump, trade analysts say

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith with Ontario Premier Doug Ford. Photo by Dean Pilling /Postmedia

Article content

OTTAWA – With Canada set to intensify trade negotiations with the U.S. in the coming weeks, trade analysts say the premiers must give the federal government latitude to negotiate from a position of strength.

Article content

“The premiers are going to have to give the federal government the political licence and the social licence to make some of those difficult decisions when it comes down to negotiating,” said Matthew Holmes, executive vice-president & chief of public policy at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.

Article content

Article content

Article content

The U.S. administration has announced its intention to impose a 50 per-cent tariff on range of Canadian goods last week, in response to what they view as unfair trade practices from Canada on dairy, U.S. alcohol moratoriums at the provincial level and auto tariff quotas. The tariffs would be imposed under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Article content

Article content

In response, Prime Minister Mark Carney said he and U.S. President Donald Trump have agreed to “intensify” negotiations in the coming weeks, ahead of the tariffs coming into effect on Aug. 19.

Article content

Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc was in Washington this week, along with Chief Trade Negotiator Janice Charette, where they met with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

Article content

Greer said told U.S. senators last week, that he hopes to have potential “interim” agreements with Mexico and Canada separately, by the end of 2026. While broader issues like rules of origin related to the Canada-United-States-Mexico-Agreement (CUSMA) will be addressed in 2027, as it requires engagement with U.S. Congress.

Article content

Carney has said that Canada is looking for a comprehensive agreement around the Section 232 tariffs that currently apply to Canadian steel, aluminum and autos, and would not rule out retaliation, should the latest Section 338 tariffs go through.

Article content

Article content

The prime minister this week ruled out cutting oil exports to the U.S., arguing there are “other things” Canada has at its disposal.

Article content

Article content

Maryscott Greenwood, former U.S. diplomat and founder of Ottawa Street Strategy, said while Canada up until now has been proportional and reasonable, it is now time for Canada to use its leverage.

Article content

“It’s about leverage, and it’s about being willing to exercise leverage and making sure that Canadians, writ large, the business community, the public, regardless of where they’re from geographically or what sector they’re in, give the government the leeway it needs to be tough and to negotiate what’s in the best interest for Canada,” she said, adding that it’s easier said than done.

Article content

The premiers met in Charlottetown last week, with Trump’s latest tariff threat overshadowing the agenda. All the premiers had strong views on the best course of action in the face of the new tariff threat.

Article content

Quebec Premier Christine Fréchette called for provinces to have a seat at the negotiating table, while B.C. Premier David Eby and Ontario Premier Doug Ford offered ideas on possible retaliation, including leveraging potash, energy and critical mineral exports to the U.S. At the conclusion of the first minister’s meeting, premiers touted a united front, but Holmes is not convinced it will last if the trade war persists.