Nathan Disenhouse: JNF court case strikes a blow against the weaponization of charitable oversight

A Federal Court of Canada sign. Photo by Hyungcheol Park/Postmedia

Article content

The Federal Court of Appeal’s ruling in the case of the Jewish National Fund of Canada (JNF Canada) is an important step towards restoring accountability in Canada’s charitable regulatory system. The ruling found that federal Minister François-Philippe Champagne and his Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) have not fully complied with a prior order requiring the production of relevant documents.

Article content

Article content

At its core, this case speaks to a troubling trend: the increasing weaponization of charitable oversight. This ruling reinforces the fact that the minister is required to act with fairness and accountability in how charities are treated by federal regulators.

Article content

Article content

Article content

The Jewish National Fund of Canada (JNF) has been one of Canada’s oldest and most respected charities, building parks, planting trees, developing medical, cultural and educational centres, and more, to benefit all residents in Israel. In August 2024, however, JNF had its charitable status summarily revoked by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) in the middle of ongoing court proceedings. The Federal Court of Appeal has now ruled for a second time that CRA must provide full disclosure of relevant documents to the JNF.

Article content

Respected Federal Court of Appeal Justice David Stratas ordered the CRA to conduct a search of multiple CRA offices — and the minister’s office — for any documents relevant to JNF’s case and its allegation that the minister was biased against the Jewish charity. This represents a significant victory. JNF simply wants to get back to doing charitable work, not engaging in long and protracted litigation with Minister Champagne and his officials.

Article content

Article content

JNF Canada has maintained that it was treated inconsistently, and that the CRA failed to apply its own standards in a clear and even-handed way. With this ruling, the court has reinforced that regulators must follow the rules, just as the organizations they oversee are expected to do.

Article content

Article content

Canada’s charitable sector depends on public trust. That trust is built not only on the good work charities do, but on confidence that the system governing them is impartial and consistent. But when CRA decisions appear biased or arbitrary, it puts the entire sector at risk.

Article content

In a globalized world, many Canadian charities engage in work across the world. That reality makes it even more important that regulators provide clear guidance and apply standards consistently. As Justice Stratas noted in his decision, “We insist that all who exercise public power — no matter how lofty, no matter how important — must be subject to meaningful and fully independent review and accountability.”

Article content

Critics of JNF Canada may be tempted to view this decision through a political lens. But that would miss the point. Supporting the court’s ruling is not about endorsing any particular organization’s mission or activities. It is about defending the principles that ensure all organizations are treated fairly.