Israel Ellis: It’s minutes to midnight for Canada’s Jews

A bullet hole is seen in a front door at Temple Emanu-El in Toronto on March 3, 2026. The temple was one of three Toronto-area Jewish sites targeted by gunfire in less than a week. Many in the Jewish community are now questioning whether it's safe to remain in Canada, writes Israel Ellis. Photo by Peter J. Thompson / National Post

Article content

In 1947, a group of scientists created a clock — to measure a world teetering on the edge of its own destruction. Born from the fear of a nuclear arms race between Moscow and Washington, they called it the Doomsday Clock. Its face was simple: an analogue dial, a single minute hand leading to midnight — the point of no return.

Article content

Today that clock is how I would describe a humanity in moral peril. Because it is at minutes to midnight that I find Canada’s Jews — staring down the barrel of uncertainty, the question echoing around every dining room table: should we stay, or should we go? Every decent Canadian who understands the moral values that are the bedrock this country was built on has good reason to ask this question.

Article content

Article content

Article content

My grandparents arrived in Canada in the 1890s. They came with nothing and built a life, a family, a community. I am the third generation. My children are the fourth. This is not an uncommon story in Canada’s Jewish community. Our families worked hard. We built businesses, professions, organizations, and endowed public facilities — a legacy that says: we were here, we did this, and our values are to provide for others. And yet I am having conversations with people I could never have imagined possible. This is not Warsaw in 1933. This is Toronto. 2026.

Article content

Article content

This conversation is not mine alone. It is happening in synagogues and living rooms across this country, in voices kept low so the children do not hear, by people who reasonably assumed that the home their grandparents chose would hold. I believe these words echo the thoughts of many.

Article content

Our focus was always on the far right, and yet the left — armed with DEI — became the wolves in sheep’s clothing that we did not see coming for us — progressives wrapped in the language of human rights, equity and anti-racism, who have built beneath that language something I can only describe as a perversion of the moral order. They have fused Marxist anti-colonial ideology with Jihadist grievance politics and arrived, by some bizarre calculation, at the Jew as the source of the world’s suffering. Their humanism is loud. It has one exemption. It does not include the Jew.

Article content

Article content

This narrative has corrupted something foundational to Canadian values — the Judeo-Christian civic foundation on which this country’s laws and social architecture were built. Not as religion, but as civilization. The dignity of the individual. The rule of secular law. The genuine protection of minorities. These are being systematically dismantled, with progressive applause, by a value system that is their direct opposite. After October 7 it became a landslide of hate. I have watched a prime minister — and now his successor, a person of questionable intelligence — look Canadian Jews in the eye and refuse to name the sources of their abandonment. Mark Carney’s words are not confusion. They are a choice.

Article content

Article content

There is the explicit antisemitism — the masked and keffiyeh-clad protesters propping up terrorism, the street tags, the social posts, the violence. It can be photographed, prosecuted, condemned in a press release. And then there is what I call the greatest threat: subversive antisemitism. It wears institutional clothing — and it is far more dangerous precisely because it is deniable. It sits inside the Canada Revenue Agency, stripping century-old Jewish charities of their status without due process, while organizations with documented ties to terror-designated groups collect Canadian taxpayer money undisturbed. It sits on school boards that bus students to anti-Israel rallies as though they were field trips. It sits in our public broadcaster, framing Israeli self-defence in language so distorted audiences can no longer distinguish between a military response and a massacre. It sat on the government committee struck to study antisemitism — appointed there by the prime minister himself — individuals with documented terrorist sympathizers. It wore a lapel pin reading “From the River to the Sea” while serving passengers on an Air Canada flight at 35,000 feet. It pencilled hate slogans into the sidewalks of Collingwood, Ont. There are too many incidents of betrayal, making Jews feel unwelcome and unsafe — too much of a licence granted to the haters to act without consequence. And yet each hostile event gets explained away. An aberration. An isolated case. But these are not isolated. They are a pattern sustained across institutions, over years, with impunity. It is a policy of permission — one that normalizes antisemitism with a distinct message: Jews not welcome in Canada.