ICBC request to adjourn trial due to World Cup's impact on jury cases denied by judge

B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver. Photo by Jason Payne /PNG

Article content

Lawyers defending ICBC in a personal-injury lawsuit have been denied a request to adjourn a trial that is scheduled for later this month so that the case can be heard by a jury.

Article content

Article content

Article content

The scheduled start date for the trial, June 29, falls in the middle of the tournament.

Article content

Lawyers and judges were informed last year there would be no jury or criminal trials at Metro Vancouver courthouses during this period because police resources were likely going to be strained, as would the sheriff services that support court operations.

Article content

Article content

But to now adjourn the case to accommodate a jury would “likely result in a delay of more than a year,” B.C. Supreme Court Associate Judge Scott Nielsen said in denying the request.

Article content

Article content

He also ruled ICBC lawyers didn’t submit reasons why a jury trial was preferred over a trail by judge alone.

Article content

The case involves a personal injury claim by Sukhwinder Kour related to two motor vehicle accidents that occurred in March and May 2018.

Article content

In February 2025, a trial date was set for June 29, 2026. ICBC lawyers at the time also filed a letter with the court electing a jury trial.

Article content

But in July 2025, the B.C. Supreme Court announced that no criminal trials and no civil jury trials would be held during the “FIFA period” of June 12 to July 8, 2026.

Article content

“The important priorities of public safety and traffic and crowd management during the event will draw heavily on police resources in the Lower Mainland and potentially elsewhere in the province,” a court notice said at the time.

Article content

The announcement also said because of deployment of sheriffs for tournament security, there may not be enough sheriffs to provide security for the courts, including transporting accused persons and managing juries. It said court operations could be affected by heavy traffic and a shortage of hotel rooms for deliberating juries or out-of-town witnesses.

Article content

Article content

Pre-trial proceedings for the trial had already begun earlier this year. In March, Kour was examined by an ICBC-appointed doctor, and she was scheduled to attend an examination for discovery on April 1.

Article content

Article content

But ICBC lawyers cancelled the hearing on that day and advised days later they were seeking an adjournment of the trial so it could be heard by a jury.

Article content

Kour’s lawyers opposed the application to adjourn, noting that eight years had passed since the accidents. The trial had already been adjourned once before and the prospect of adjourning would be stressful for the plaintiff and cause her to face additional costs.

Article content

ICBC lawyers said access to a jury trial was a substantive right.

Article content

In denying the application to adjourn, Nielsen noted that the request to adjourn came nine months after lawyers were notified about the World Cup’s impacts on scheduling and three months before trial.

Article content

The judge also noted that ICBC lawyers hadn’t specified in the application to adjourn why it sought a jury trial.

Article content

“I assume there is a perceived tactical advantage to a jury trial in the circumstances,” he wrote. However, this “does not provide a rationale that transcends a mere preference for a jury trial. Rather, it is a strategic choice.”

Article content

“For the plaintiff, the trial will likely be delayed by a year. Based on her evidence, it will cause financial hardship and potentially put her and her husband’s retirement plans at risk,” the judge added.

Article content

“There is a point where justice delayed is justice denied.”

Article content

— With files from Douglas Quan 

Article content

Article content