Government will support bill to protect Gatineau Park — with conditions

A private member's bill aims to enhance legal protections for Gatineau Park. Photo by ASHLEY FRASER /POSTMEDIA

Article content

After a long line of failed attempts to strengthen legal protections for a “treasure” of the National Capital Region, the government intends to support a private member’s bill aiming to define and protect Gatineau Park — but only if certain changes are made.

Article content

Public Works Minister Joël Lightbound, whose mandate includes overseeing the National Capital Commission (NCC), supports the bill, with amendments.

Article content

Article content

Article content

“We have a collective responsibility to ensure this park is protected and well managed,” he said at a Senate committee meeting Tuesday, Oct. 20.

Article content

“It’s a treasure that we have here.”

Article content

Bill S-229, sponsored by Independent Senator Rosa Galvez, seeks to establish the boundaries of Gatineau Park and prohibit the sale of public lands located within those boundaries. It would also prioritize “ecological integrity” in how the NCC manages the park and allow the federal cabinet to create regulations and set fees related to the park.

Article content

Private member’s bills rarely become law as they’re introduced by parliamentarians who aren’t in cabinet.

Article content

Galvez and the bill’s co-author Liberal MP Sophie Chatel have been trying for years to pass legal protections for the park.

Article content

Article content

Their previous attempt died on the order paper when Parliament was dissolved ahead of the 2025 federal election. That attempt, in turn, followed 13 earlier efforts between 2005 and 2013 to amend the National Capital Act — a law that established the NCC — specifically to protect Gatineau Park.

Article content

Article content

Most of those bills were private member’s bills brought forward by NDP legislators, though the Conservative government under former prime minister Stephen Harper also made a failed attempt in 2014.

Article content

At the Senate hearing Tuesday, Lightbound gave an overview of the government’s proposed amendments, which are still being finalized and haven’t yet been shared with senators studying the bill.

Article content

First, he said the bill should only apply to federal lands within the park (amounting to about 86 per cent of the park’s total area), while excluding provincial, municipal and private lands.

Article content

“To my mind, it’s a matter of being clear,” he said.

Article content

Second, certain leases, easements and other limited rights needed for roads, utilities and visitor services would need to be maintained.

Article content

And finally, rather than an outright prohibition on the sale of public lands located within the park, Lightbound proposed a “no net loss principle.”

Article content

“As a general rule, any land removed from the park should be replaced by an equal or greater area,” he said. “A smaller area could be considered only if it makes a greater contribution to ecological integrity.”