Gail Asper isn’t visibly angry about ‘Nakba’ exhibit. But she’s resolute about fixing the rights museum

Article content

“It feels intentional that the Jewish voice and connection to this museum is deliberately being diminished,” she observes. Her phone and inbox have been “exploding” since the announcement. Supporters who trusted the Aspers to create something intellectually honest feel betrayed.

Article content

“The whole point of the museum is to bring people together,” she explains. “The whole point is to have dialogue and debate. So the whole point of this exhibit, as I said to everybody, was that there are hard truths on both sides. Let’s have all the hard truths and let’s have the rational, quiet, respectful debate the museum was intended to inspire.

Article content

“But when you obliterate one side of the narrative so egregiously, obviously, and so ideologically and intentionally, you lose that trust from one part of the participants. And that’s where I really am so disappointed in the museum. They didn’t have to do it this way.”

Article content

She made repeated efforts to steer things differently, including a presentation to the board six weeks before opening. As an honorary board member, she reminded them of the museum’s mandate and warned about fanning antisemitism at a fraught time. There was no meaningful response.

Article content

Article content

“I just thought this is heartless,” she says. “There is no compassion for the place that we have now found ourselves in the Jewish community.”

Article content

Then, one week before opening, the sole Jewish board member, Mark Berlin, resigned. “I think he was gaslit,” Gail says. Berlin, a respected human rights lawyer who had lived and worked in Ramallah, called her before stepping down. “It was a very sad conversation,” but she understood.

Article content

Article content

Federal Heritage Minister Marc Miller weighed in this week after visiting the exhibit, calling aspects of the curation regrettable failures — including not identifying Hamas as a terrorist organization or clearly stating its intent on October 7. He said the exhibit “should be rectified.”

Article content

Prime Minister Mark Carney has not commented directly, though his June speech on antisemitism and the new advisory council (chaired by Miller) acknowledged that Canada’s “civic compact is failing Jewish Canadians.”

Article content

Gail, a corporate/commercial lawyer called to the bar in 1985 and former general counsel to CanWest Global, the former owner of National Post, takes governance seriously. She believes the minister was right to speak up. “I am certain he would have greatly preferred for the board to do its job,” she says.

Article content

Article content

What would restoration look like? Immediate expert review of the exhibit and additions for context; pausing study guides and materials until balanced; and ensuring docents can present the full history fairly.

Article content

In the meantime, new funding from the Asper Foundation has stopped. “I can’t in my heart be funding something that is spreading such dangerous misinformation.”

Article content

Yet Gail still believes in the museum’s potential.

Article content

“Institutions can get hijacked,” she concludes. “Universities, through bad leadership. A theatre. An art gallery. And then they can be driven into the ground and you think they’re dead.” But you get good leadership, and they can be revived.

Article content

“I still absolutely believe in the institution,” she smiles. “There’s a failure in good leadership, but that can be changed.”

Article content

Her restraint may be her most persuasive argument yet. Her father would be proud — not of the current misstep, but of the unyielding demand that the museum live up to the vision he entrusted to her: rigorous, contextual truth-telling that brings Canadians together rather than driving them apart.

Article content

Special to National Post

Article content

Article content