Free on-street parking isn't worth the cost | Letters to the Editor

A bylaw officer places a parking ticket on the windshield of a vehicle in the ByWard Market on Aug. 27, 2026. Photo by Tony Caldwell /POSTMEDIA

Article content

Free on-street parking isn’t worth the cost

Article content

Re: Is getting rid of paid on-street parking a great idea or bonkers?

Article content

Article content

Columnist Mohammed Adam (with whom I rarely disagree) claims this is a debate worth having. Well, perhaps a very brief debate; the answer to the headline: Bonkers.

Article content

It is reported that enforcement of the pay-for-time meter regime eats a substantial amount of meter revenue. Free parking with, presumably, enforced time limits and only conviction revenue would cost far more. As it is, an enforcement vehicle need only stop at expired meters to issue tickets. If free parking were time-limited, every licence number would have to recorded once, then checked again after the allowed time to ascertain if a violation had occurred — two visits per vehicle. A huge and costly burden on bylaw officers and tax revenue. A major employment program for many more enforcers, though.

Article content

Article content

Or there could be no time limits, so no “turnover.” This would lead to an early morning daily race, for returnees to office, to grab spaces for the day. Shoppers need not search for parking; there would be none.

Article content

Bonkers.

Article content

John Edmond, Ottawa

Article content

But professor, what about vehicles diverted to residential streets?

Article content

So a Carleton University professor has done a study showing that banning vehicles from parts of the Queen Elizabeth Driveway and reserving those areas for bicycles results in reduced emissions and noise.

Article content

I’m sure he’s right. But what about all the vehicles that are diverted onto the nearby residential streets where they inch along from stop sign to stop sign, belching out far more emissions than they would sailing along the Driveway at a steady 40 km/hr?

Article content

Bruce Little, Ottawa

Article content

Basic Grade 10 biology and why Kettle Island bridge is a bad idea

Article content

To stave off the paving of yet another paradise, I have tried to make those wanting a bridge at Kettle Island understand basic Grade 10 biology. The wilful blindness to simple science in this case is stunning.

Article content

First you have to understand that a biome is a large, naturally occurring community of flora and fauna occupying a major habitat (e.g., forest, tundra or island). The incredibly diverse and unique biomes of Kettle, Upper Duck and Lower Duck islands, and to a degree Petrie Island, are so interconnected that they actually constitute one single biome. In some places, you would not get your hair wet wading between Kettle and Upper Duck. Birds, turtles, snakes, fish and flora freely flow from one to the other.

Article content

Article content

The razing of the biome of Kettle Island would be, in fact, the razing of the entire chain. Add to that the first noise and stench of construction, and then big trucks to follow, scaring sensitive animals away from the entire area.

Article content

Article content

So how about we rename Ottawa’s own “Galápagos” chain “Kettle Islands” plural to drive this simple salient point sharply home through the heads of politicians and developers?

Article content

Thomas Brawn, Orléans

Article content

Time for Trump Avenue residents to pick new name

Article content

The time is appropriate to replace the name of Trump Avenue, but it’s a choice that only its residents can make, given the opportunity. Owing to the fact that the area and street names are New York City related, it might seem out of neighbourhood character if a new name is not somehow New York City connected.

Article content

Given the present political times, leaving the name as it is wouldn’t be a healthy endorsement for those moving to the area, the street or even those currently residing there. The time is right for a name change, and by doing so it would make a significant statement that this Ottawa neighbourhood does not support President Trump’s attitude and policies towards Canada.