Chris Selley: The DEI meltdown at a British university shows why we need more skepticism

FILE: University students return for the spring term at Cambridge University on January 13, 2004 in Cambridge, England. Photo by Graeme Robertson /Getty Images

Article content

Article content

Jason Arday, a professor of the sociology of education, became known as a rising star in academia in the early 2020s, when he became the youngest-ever or youngest-ever Black professor at various universities in sequence. His story was compelling: born with autism to Ghanaian parents, he says he was non-verbal until 11 years old, yet achieved a doctorate by 30, all while battling brain cancer. He has claimed accomplishing magnificent running feats for charity.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Alas, the Telegraph reports, Arday’s thesis at Liverpool John Moores University contained “dozens of passages… that were taken nearly verbatim from the 2009 dissertation of Paula Zwozdiak-Myers, a reader (i.e., associate professor) at Brunel University of London.” The passages are very damning indeed, though more so (for now, anyway) in terms of how obvious they are than necessarily how serious.

Article content

Article content

You can’t just copy great swaths of text from someone else and plunk them down in your paper without at least putting quotation marks around them. That’s true even if you cite the author in question many times in the same work, which Arday did. But so long as you have cited the source of the material, “sloppiness, not malice,” is often a viable defence in the court of academia.

Article content

But that’s not where Arday’s supporters went, mostly. They went straight to the imputed motives of those pointing out the problems: accusing them of being racially motivated, far-right, “vile” (as Cambridge itself put it). Arday is a “working class Black man,” a petition from the Good Law Project notes, in a typically British class-war flourish. The petition calls the allegations against Arday “groundless. That doesn’t quite explain why he reportedly sicced a defamation lawyer on Times Higher Education magazine, which was getting ready to publish a story, Retraction Watch reports.

Article content

Article content

Clinical psychologist Simon Baron Cohen, a professor at Trinity College Cambridge, went further: he played both the autism and suicide-risk cards. “(Arday) continues to be systematically discredited over every detail of his life, daily,” he wrote, while conceding “we should of course always investigate plagiarism to protect academic standards.” (So where exactly does that leave us?)

Article content

Article content

“This is relentless bullying of a vulnerable autistic man and raises safe-guarding issues.”

Article content

Well, if Arday is dangerously out of his depth, someone had to first throw him in the pool.

Article content

Academia was more than happy to have him as the poster boy for diversity, inclusion, minority achievement, all that good stuff. But there was no shortage of red flags suggesting he might be rather less than he seemed.

Article content

The largest and reddest perhaps were the athletic feats: In November 2012, Scottish tennis star Andy Murray reported drawing inspiration from Arday’s fundraising marathon runs. And why not? Such runs they were! Thirty of them in 35 days, Arday claimed, which would reportedly be in the neighbourhood of a world record. Not a world record for young academic sociologists with a running hobby; a world record for human beings.