
Article content
Do you believe your property taxes should go up to pay for food for middle-class and wealthy families? That’s not a trick question. And there’s no typo in the above line.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
- Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
- Unlimited online access to National Post.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
- Support local journalism.
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
- Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
- Unlimited online access to National Post.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
- Support local journalism.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
The answer will obviously be a resounding no for most people. Yet that’s the question Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow effectively put to voters on Monday at a re-election campaign announcement.
Article content
Article content
Mayor Chow has announced a massive expansion of the current mid-morning snack program that’s currently available to all Toronto school students. That program provides a daily snack — often an individually plastic-wrapped muffin and cut-up veggies or fruit — to over 300,000 students. But in her next term — should she be re-elected — Mayor Chow promises to offer even more and implement a lunch program.
Article content
Advertisement 1
Article content
Free lunch — for every kid, every single day. Rich or poor. Hungry or well-fed.
Article content
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Article content
Chow was clear that it’s a “universal” program. That means everyone gets it.
Article content
This is in contrast to what’s typically referred to as a “means-tested” program, where the government first verifies that the recipient is financially in need of support.
Article content
The most common criticisms of universal lunch programs are that they go to families that don’t need the financial support, that they lead to significant food waste, and that the food is typically mass-produced and not very nutritious.
Article content
A meta-study released earlier this year that looked at dozens of studies found that “school-meal programmes in high-income economies have minimal impact on students’ behaviour, health and education” and that “means-tested programmes and breakfast initiatives yield the greatest benefits for children’s outcomes.”
What’s interesting though is that Chow isn’t even arguing it’s to feed hungry, low-income kids.
Article content
“The cost of almost everything has gone up for almost everybody,” Chow said at the press conference. “When you’re packing your child’s lunch you have a lot on your mind.”
Article content
Advertisement 2
Article content
She chose to make her announcement in the Danforth and Coxwell area, which is not considered one of Toronto’s lower-income areas.
Article content
This announcement is really being touted as a middle-class savings plan instead of a plan to feed the needy. Chow claims it will save an average family $1,800 per year.
Article content
It’s also being sold as a benefit for folks who just don’t want to put in the effort — as Chow adds it will give you “a little bit more time in your evening so you don’t need to stress about packing a lunch.”
Article content
Seriously? If that’s the goal, can you also send over a city worker to fold my laundry?
Article content
We know what it’s like as a family to scramble to put together a healthy lunch for our kids in the morning while still waking up with our first coffee.
That’s called family life though. It’s just one of the things you have to do when you have school-aged kids.
Article content
It’s one thing to stress over providing a healthy lunch for your kids when you’re financially struggling and don’t have a lot of options in the fridge. It’s another to say you wish the government would do it for you because life is better when other people do your chores for you and pay for your basic supplies.
.png)
1 day ago
14


















Bengali (BD) ·
English (US) ·