Adam Zivo: The necessary rise of ‘homonationalism’

Article content

Over the past few years, the gay dating app Romeo has polled its European users ahead of elections and found surprising levels of support for anti-immigrant parties and candidates.

Article content

A poll of over 60,000 German users, for example, showed that Alternative for Germany (AfD), a hard-right nationalist party, was most popular, with 27.9 per cent support.

Article content

Another poll of 4,216 Austrian Romeo users found that the hard-right Freedom Party of Austria was their Number 1 choice, with 29.3 per cent support.

Article content

Meanwhile, in France, the populist National Rally party was the second-most-popular option among 7,221 users, with 28.2 per cent support.

Article content

Although these polls have significant methodological limitations, they nonetheless strongly suggest that conservative anti-immigration parties have become popular among European gays.

Article content

In an essay published in Spiked last year, Albie Amankona, a prominent British gay conservative, also observed that, not only are European homosexuals drifting rightward, populist leaders are getting gayer, too.

Article content

Famously, AfD’s co-leader, Alice Weidel, is in a civil union with a Sri Lankan woman — a fact that vexes “intersectional” progressives to no end. Less well-known, though, is the fact that, in France, the National Rally sent the highest number of gay parliamentarians to the National Assembly after the 2022 election.

Article content

Article content

For Amankona, the rise of gay conservative populism isn’t hard to explain: “Progressive politics has spent years insisting that all cultures are equal, that borders barely matter and that any concern about immigration is morally suspect.

Article content

“In doing so, it has refused to confront a basic reality. Attitudes to homosexuality vary dramatically across the world, and large numbers of migrants to Europe come from countries that remain deeply hostile to gay people.”

Article content

The response from progressive queer activists, however, has been predictably obtuse.

Article content

Mexican gay activist Raúl Caporal, for example, wrote a 2025 article decrying homonationalism with all the usual tropes: apparently, it “steals our empathy” and “transforms our struggles into propaganda” by undermining “solidarity with other oppressed peoples.”

Article content

A 2022 article in the Michigan Daily similarly asserted that, “Homonationalist sentiments ultimately pit queer people and people of colour against one another,” and that using “some standard of modernity or progressiveness” for comparisons is “ignorant.”

Article content

Article content

Their words are representative of the wider progressive landscape. Mirroring the op-eds published a decade ago, contemporary activists refuse to accept the well-documented reality of Islamic homophobia, so they either outright ignore it, or downplay it with morally vacuous cultural relativism.

Article content

Unable to formulate coherent arguments, they deploy smokescreens of jargon and sanctimony, while dogmatically asserting the need for “intersectional” solidarity that is, in truth, unreciprocated.

Article content

Some halfway-decent arguments against homonationalism, however, were raised in a 2022 article published in Feministclub Amsterdam.

Article content

Although the author resorted to lazy cliches (such as accusing homonationalists of fostering “racist and especially Islamophobic discourses”), she also pointed out, quite reasonably, that populist conservatism has often been hostile toward LGBT people, having, until recently, opposed the recognition of same-sex relationships and families.

Article content

Yet political movements are always evolving and should primarily be evaluated by their current beliefs and dynamics, not their political genealogy — it was not that long ago that the centre-left also opposed many forms of gay rights, after all.