Adam Pankratz: Mark Carney’s elitist quest to turn us into Europeans

France's President Emmanuel Macron and Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney hold a meeting on the sidelines of the 8th European Political Community (EPC) summit in Yerevan on May 4, 2026. (Photo by Ludovic MARIN / AFP via Getty Images)

Article content

This weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported that Prime Minister Mark Carney is pushing for associate membership with the European Union in an effort to diversify Canada away from the United States. Though, on Sunday evening Carney downplayed the story, and said he is seeking a “unique alliance” with the EU. It’s a convenient dodge in any case as both terms are undefined in any legal sense and Canadians deserve to know what the Prime Minister is actually up to.

Article content

Article content

While there are solid economic and security reasons to pursue greater integration with Europe, it is far from clear that these are the only forces driving the government. One senior Canadian official was quoted by the Journal as saying “Canadians, we sound like Americans, we dress like Americans, but as a society we’re much more European.”

Article content

Article content

Article content

That is reflective of an elite and out of touch attitude which may sound good in urban Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, but which does not reflect the reality of most Canadians and could end up seriously harming them. 

Article content

Elements under discussion between Canada and the EU reportedly include “ways to let Canada’s goods, services and workers involved in strategic supply chains such as energy, AI, defense and critical minerals move freely” and “laying underwater cables, jointly constructing data centers, cloud storage and new satellite networks and infrastructure to ship Canadian energy to the EU.” 

Article content

While not all of those items may be desirable, some unequivocally are. On the negative side of the ledger would almost certainly be the free flow of workers between Canada and the EU. We have seen this play out in Europe before, notably in the United Kingdom. The simple reality is that more people in Europe (and the world) speak English as a second language than vice-versa. That affects the direction of travel of the workers. On pure linguistic grounds alone, it is nearly certain that Canada, as a primarily English-speaking nation, would be opening its workers up to far more competition from English speaking Europeans, than, say, Greek or German workers would face from Greek or German speaking Canadians. Any politician who avoids the difficulty of that question alone is in for a massive shock when push comes to shove. A “free flow” of people and workers goes both ways and isn’t an unalloyed good for Canadians.  

Article content

Article content

However, the idea of Canada acting as a close and trusted European partner to host data centres and export energy to Europe is a fantastic one. How much oil and gas does Europe want from Canada? Whatever the answer, start building the pipelines to supply it tomorrow and then build five more. This is as much of an economic no-brainer as any country is likely to find.

Article content

Article content

Europe needs reliable gas that doesn’t come from Russia and Canada has enormous gas reserves. A more ideal partnership is hard to imagine, excepting of course the niggling problem that we can’t get the gas to our east coast in large quantities because the pipelines aren’t there.  

Article content

Also of importance, and hidden behind the Wall Street Journal’s reporting, are the serious problems related related to any EU deal in general. Notably, given our recent blow up with the United States over our trading relationship, is the issue of sovereignty. Much about what exactly went wrong in that negotiation remains unclear, but Canadians were told by both the prime minister and chief trade negotiator Janice Charette that the United States sought provisions which would be “constraining or limiting (to) Canada’s ability to enter into future free trade agreements.” That threat to our sovereignty was unacceptable so Canada walked away. If true, we were right do so.