Why Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s school run for kids will create the ‘most dangers’

1 hour ago 8

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daily school runs with their two kids reportedly pose the “most danger” for them after they returned to the UK without taxpayer-funded security.

“It is absolutely the biggest area of concern,” a friend close to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex told The Telegraph in an interview published Sunday.

“It creates the most dangers.”

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daily school runs will reportedly pose the biggest threat for them. (Seen here: The couple with their kids.) meghan/Instagram
“It is absolutely the biggest area of concern,” an insider close to the duo friend close to the told The Telegraph on Sunday. (Seen above: The family of four.) meghan/Instagram

It’s unclear where Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5, will attend school, but Harry, 41, and Markle, 45, reportedly plan to take them to school and pick them up as time allows.

According to the outlet, staff at Lilibet and Archie’s school already received notice of their attendance. Additionally, various policies and procedures have already been enforced, and teachers have undergone specific training.

Harry and Markle are awaiting an answer from the UK’s Home Office about whether they will receive long- term taxpayer-funded police protection now that they are residing in Europe. They were previously denied protection rights during visits to the UK.

“It creates the most dangers,” the insider added. (Seen here: Markle and Harry with their kids.) Alexi Lubomirski / Duke and Duch
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reportedly plan on taking their children to school. (Seen above: Harry with their kids.) Instagram/@meghan

The “Spare” author’s risk assessment was completed in July. However, he has yet to receive an answer, including whether the assessment included Markle and their kids.

Harry believes he was being denied protection because he quit his royal duties in 2020, and Scott Hamer — a former Metropolitan Police royalty and specialist protection officer — also thinks the prince hasn’t received a fair assessment.

“If there is a credible threat to him and his family, it should be objectively assessed,” Hamer told the Telegraph. “If there is a genuine risk, the state should provide protection. If not, that’s fine, but let him know.”

However, the couple (seen above) notably don’t have taxpayer-funded security. / SplashNews.com
Harry and Markle (seen here) lost the right to their security when they quit the royal family. Zak Hussein / BACKGRID

Want more celebrity and pop culture news?

Start your day with Page Six Daily.

Thanks for signing up!

Hamer also defended Harry’s status as a non-working royal, saying, “It doesn’t matter.”

“It doesn’t matter whether he’s a working, or non-working royal,” he added. “The late Queen Mother got protection after she retired, as did Princess Margaret, as does every ex-prime minister. The risk doesn’t just vanish.”

The Telegraph also reviewed Harry’s 40-page risk assessment forms, which cited that he has had five terror plots against him in the UK over the years.

Additionally, the report revealed that the couple’s security team stopped an armed man, who carried a hammer and duct tape, at their Montecito, California, home in 2023.

The Duke of Sussex also told the Home Security office in August that he and his family were moving back to Europe for at least six months.

According to the outlet, the Duke of Sussex argues the evaluation for taxpayer security should be re-evaluated due to a “significant change in circumstances.”

Harry (seen here) hasn’t given up the fight to get it back. Zak Hussein / BACKGRID
The family of four is currently living in the UK. (Seen here: Markle and Harry.) Zak Hussein / BACKGRID

Last month, Page Six confirmed Markle and Harry were moving back across the pond to be closer to King Charles amid his ongoing battle with cancer.

The bombshell move came after Harry told the BBC last year that he couldn’t “see a world” where he could bring Markle and his kids to the UK without security.

However, in July, the duo brought their own security team with them when they visited the UK with their little ones, and made the move back without funded personnel.

Welcome to the Page Six Community!

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas in a safe space.

In order to do so, we've created a simple set of rules that will improve your experience.

Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will/might be rejected if it contains:

  • Spam
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language and threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author

User accounts will/might be blocked if we notice:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, or homophobic comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your passion. Feel free to elaborate to get your point across.
  • 'Like' or 'Dislike' when you are filled with emotions!
  • Protect your community. Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Don't forget, freedom of speech is not the freedom of reach!

*** Disclaimer: This Article is auto-aggregated by a Rss Api Program and has not been created or edited by Bdtype.

(Note: This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News Rss Api. News.bdtype.com Staff may not have modified or edited the content body.

Please visit the Source Website that deserves the credit and responsibility for creating this content.)

Watch Live | Source Article