US Supreme Court rejects Trump’s plans on postal ballots: Why it matters

The United States Supreme Court has rejected Donald Trump’s bid to restrict voting by message up of the November midterm elections, successful a setback to the US president’s efforts to alteration rules governing elections.

The ruling connected Monday by the blimpish supermajority tribunal allows states to proceed sending retired message ballots arsenic they person done for years, dealing a stroke to Trump’s plans to halt the ballots earlier the elections and halting imaginable last-minute ineligible actions arsenic voting begins successful immoderate states.

Recommended Stories

• list 1 of 4US Supreme Court rejects Trump message ballot restrictions up of midterms
• list 2 of 4US Kennedy Center faces bankruptcy, Washington Post reports
• list 3 of 4US tribunal rejects Trump’s exigency bid keeping Michigan ember works open
• list 4 of 4US tribunal blocks Trump medication program to chopped catastrophe bureau workforce

Trump has repeatedly formed uncertainty connected the information of mail-in voting, citing debunked claims of wide predetermination fraud associated with it. That is contempt the president voting by message himself, including during the 2024 election.

Mail ballots, successful spot for decades, person been recovered to summation elector turnout and presently relationship for a 3rd of each votes formed successful the US.

Here’s what we cognize astir the ineligible situation to overturn them:

President Trump speaks astatine the Republican National Midterm Convention successful Dallas, Texas, US, September 9, 2026 [Evan Vucci/Reuters]

What are mail-in votes?

Voting by station works by sending ballots to the homes of registered voters, who past message them backmost earlier a deadline.

Eight states, respective of them Democratic-leaning – California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington – arsenic good arsenic the District of Columbia, let each elections to beryllium conducted wholly by mail.

Others lone let smaller elections to beryllium conducted by mail.

Although determination are cases of forgery oregon repetition voting, they are uncommon and magnitude to conscionable four successful 10 cardinal mailed votes, according to the Brookings Institution.

What has Trump said astir the mail-in votes?

Trump falsely blamed his 2020 statesmanlike predetermination nonaccomplishment connected mail-in voting fraud. He and his supporters besides opposed changes made during the COVID pandemic to grow mail-in voting.

During the 2020 Republican National Convention, Trump called mail-in voting changes “the top scam successful the past of politics”.

His effort to propulsion the SAVE America Act, which calls for sweeping voting laws, has stalled successful the US Senate. The bill, passed successful the House of Representatives successful February, faces absorption implicit concerns that millions of voters volition beryllium disenfranchised.

How did Trump people mail-in votes?

In March 2026, Trump signed an enforcement bid directing the US Postal Service to instrumentality power of message voting by designing caller envelopes with peculiar barcodes that would let the national authorities to guarantee ballots are lone from eligible voters.

For the midterms, that determination would unit each states to follow a azygous envelope benignant successful a abbreviated time.

The bid besides required states to supply the US Postal Service with a database of eligible voters up of elections. Several authorities departments, including Homeland Security and US Citizenship and Immigration Services, would besides person the voters’ lists.

The postal bureau was additionally empowered to contradict mailed ballots if they did not comply with caller standards oregon were not associated with registered voters connected the states’ lists.

What happened to the order?

Democrats and activists challenged the bid successful respective courts, resulting successful a bid of back-and-forth rulings betwixt May and August.

US District Judge Indira Talwani imposed an injunction against the regularisation successful June connected the ground that it apt violated the US Constitution. Talwani besides noted successful her injunction that Trump’s enforcement bid would beryllium intolerable to use erstwhile the midterms were already truthful close.

But her ruling was overturned by the conservative-majority Supreme Court successful precocious August successful a impermanent judgement.

The Supreme Court had not decided astatine the clip whether Trump’s determination was constitutionally legal. Rather, it lone sided with the Trump medication connected procedural grounds aft the medication argued that Democrats sued excessively soon.

What does the latest judgement mean?

In the latest and last decision, the Supreme Court refused to assistance Judge Talwani’s injunction.

In a little written bid that did not spell into detail, the tribunal noted that the medication was apt to neglect successful its propulsion to restrict mail-in votes up of the midterms.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who was appointed by Trump, voted with the bulk against the administration, though helium indicated helium could enactment the argumentation astatine a aboriginal stage. Two judges, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, dissented.

Critics person agelong warned that restricting mail-in ballots could disenfranchise immoderate voters who typically trust connected this method.

It could besides disrupt the transportation of mailed votes, arsenic immoderate states, including Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin, person begun sending successful midterm ballots.