Trump to ask US Supreme Court for new hearing on birthright citizenship

In June, the Supreme Court ruled against Trump’s bid to restrict birthright citizenship for immoderate individuals calved successful the US.

US President Donald Trump says helium plans to inquire the United States Supreme Court to rehear a caller lawsuit which struck down his bid to end birthright citizenship for each individuals calved successful the US.

The tribunal past period rejected Trump’s effort to restrict birthright citizenship successful the US, but speaking connected Wednesday, the president said helium volition inquire for the lawsuit to beryllium heard again.

Recommended Stories

• list 1 of 3‘False narrative’: Families situation Trump’s 75-country US visa suspension
• list 2 of 3Pope Leo, Mamdani nonstop pro-immigrant connection for US’s 250th anniversary
• list 3 of 3At 250, America is inactive deciding who belongs

“AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! In fact, that is simply a crime, and therefore, the Supreme Court’s ruling is wrong,” Trump wrote connected his societal media platform, Truth Social. “I volition beryllium asking for a Rehearing by the United States Supreme Court, IMMEDIATELY.”

The 6-3 ruling against Trump’s bid represented a large stroke to the US person and his efforts to alteration migration policy.

Upon taking bureau connected January 20, 2025, Trump signed an enforcement bid seeking to barroom those calved successful the US to parents connected impermanent ineligible statuses oregon without documentation from automatically receiving US citizenship.

Trump called the latest ruling “too atrocious for our country” and appealed to Republicans successful Congress to walk authorities constricting birthright citizenship. That volition apt beryllium to beryllium an uphill battle, with nationalist sentiment polls regularly showing beardown nationalist enactment for the signifier and the Supreme Court’s bulk sentiment suggesting a law amendment would beryllium required.

Trump’s chances of a caller proceeding look low, with the Supreme Court seldom granting requests to rehear cases. It has been decades since the tribunal past allowed a retrial aft issuing a ruling successful an argued case.

Immigration overhaul

Since taking office, Trump has looked to overhaul astir all forms of immigration successful the US.

The tribunal had antecedently handed the president respective migration victories successful caller months, including allowing him to efficaciously bash distant with peculiar ineligible presumption for residents of immoderate crisis-hit countries, called Temporary Protected Status, and employing a arguable maneuver of physically blocking asylum seekers from stepping connected US soil, wherever the authorities is legally obligated to let them to use for protection.

But the Supreme Court voted against his bid to restrict birthright citizenship successful the US, ruling that his directive violated connection successful the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment that confers citizenship to those calved successful the US who are “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.

Rights groups hailed the court’s decision. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawyer Cecillia Wang, who argued the situation astatine the Supreme Court, said the determination “reaffirms a cardinal American committedness – if you are calved here, you are a citizen”.

A Migration Policy Institute-Penn State survey released successful May of past twelvemonth said an estimated 255,000 infants a twelvemonth would beryllium calved successful the US without citizenship nether the order, expanding the undocumented colonisation by 2.7 cardinal by 2045.

It warned that the bid “would make a self-perpetuating, multigenerational underclass – with US-born residents inheriting the societal disadvantage borne by their parents and even, implicit time, their grandparents and great-grandparents”.