Trump ballroom construction can continue amid legal challenges, U.S. Supreme Court rules

A view of the ongoing construction of a helipad, left, and ballroom, right, at the White House, as seen from the Washington Monument observation deck in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 28, 2026. Photo by Aaron Schwartz/AFP via Getty Images

Article content

The US Supreme Court on Monday allowed President Donald Trump to continue construction of his White House ballroom, granting him a major victory against opponents of the project.

Article content

The conservative-dominated court voted 5-4 to lift a lower order demanding construction be halted, with Chief Justice John Roberts notably joining the court’s three liberals in dissenting.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Roberts earlier this month issued a temporary order to allow construction while the full court weighed the matter.

Article content

Article content

The project has roiled Washington, with critics saying Trump acted unlawfully by unilaterally ordering the demolition of the entire White House East Wing.

Article content

The court decision means construction will advance, while a lawsuit brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation will play out in lower courts — a process that could take months or years.

Article content

The National Trust did not immediately return AFP’s request for comment.

Article content

In its decision the court said that the government was likely to eventually win the ongoing lawsuit because the National Trust probably did not have the right to bring the claim in the first place.

Article content

The organization’s case is grounded by one of its members, Washington resident Alison Hoagland, who claims that seeing the finished ballroom would result in damage to her “aesthetic, cultural, and historical interests,” due to its size.

Article content

“This Court has not found standing in circumstances like these before. To the contrary, we have repeatedly held that mere offense, disagreement, or distaste does not qualify as a concrete and particularized injury,” under the US constitution, the five justices wrote in their ruling.

Article content

Article content

“Perhaps nearly any government action or project offends someone’s sensibilities,” they added.

Article content

Article content

However, those justices made clear that they were not making a final ruling on the legality of the ballroom project, just that construction could continue while the case is argued and decided in lower courts.

Article content

The dissenting justices wrote that the project was “likely unlawful,” because “Congress has not passed any law resembling ‘express authority'” for the administration to undertake it — despite a law requiring it to do so.

Article content

They also argued that Hoagland’s claims “suffices for standing.”

Article content

While the ballroom has drawn headlines, the project also includes a military bunker.

Article content

A district court and, later, an appellate court, halted work on the ballroom while allowing construction on the military facility to continue.

Article content

The president has trumpeted the ballroom as necessary for hosting galas and state dinners, while also stressing the national security need for the bunker.

Article content

Article content