Preston Manning: Canadians deserve better than a tariff ‘war’

The U.S. and Canada flags flutter next to the Blue Water Bridge border crossing in Point Edward, Ontario, on October 24, 2025. Photo by GEOFF ROBINS /AFP via Getty Images

Article content

Responding to the Trump tariffs with dollar-for-dollar counter-tariffs is the most predictable and unimaginative course of action that Canada’s federal government could possibly pursue. Canadians deserve better — much better.

Article content

Economists have long maintained that nobody wins tariff wars and that they invariably result in higher prices. Thus, it is consumers, on both sides of the border, who will be the ultimate victims of any Canada-US tariff war — “war” being the term chosen by our prime minister as his government once again mobilizes fear to secure Canadian support for his government’s actions.

Article content

Article content

Article content

So, what are some positive, less predictable, and more imaginative alternatives?

Article content

Article content

How about expanding Canada’s negotiating and advisory team to include some wiser and more experienced heads offering fresh perspectives?

Article content

How about pursuing a strategy that incorporates appeals to Trump’s political base to secure amelioration of his tariff policies?

Article content

And how about calling for a ten-week truce in the tariff war to give consumer interests and commons sense a chance to bring their influence to bear?

Article content

You scoff? You’ve swallowed the elbows up mantra? So, allow me to elaborate.

Article content

A better negotiating and advisory team should include a few key executives from the resource sectors that have leverage with Trump; characters experienced with the bluff and bluster of dealmakers like Trump; and a few political advisors who understand populism — maybe people like Premiers Scott Moe and Danielle Smith — for advice on how to get to a populist leader via his followers.

Article content

These additions will not likely be bilingual nor have the dress and mannerisms of a central banker. But they will add perspectives and influence largely absent from Carney’s present circle.

Article content

Article content

A better strategy would be one that focuses on appealing to U.S. consumers — whose cost of living is not declining as Trump promised — rallying them to demand a modification of Trump’s tariff policies. This could include Canadian spokespersons and persuaders going to Main Street, USA and the talk shows and podcasters who speak directly to Trump’s followers — appealing to them to demand a relaxation of Trump’s tariff policy toward Canada.

Article content

This strategy would more vigorously seek to amplify the advice and support of Canadian allies in Congress — like Senator Susan Collins from Maine (a U.S. state bordering New Brunswick and Quebec) who has repeatedly called the tariffs on Canada a “mistake.”

Article content

It would especially involve encouraging U.S. consumers and voters to urge Trump to “do a McKinley” — the 25th U.S. president whom Trump professes to admire. While a strong advocate of tariffs, McKinley also quietly negotiated “reciprocity agreements” with U.S. trading partners that took much of the economic sting out of them.

Article content

And why try for a ten-week truce? Trump’s behaviour, as illustrated by his on-again-off-again offensive against Iran, often includes “pauses” which would be helpful to both sides in this dispute. Why ten weeks? Because that would take us to the November 3rd midterm elections in the U.S. when consumers and voters, unhappy with their increased cost of living, will have a chance to express their unhappiness with the tariff wars and to put pressure on the president to change course on tariffs before a less friendly Congress forces him to do so.