Opinion: Before we call government plan to buy empty condos a bailout, let’s look at the math

Premier David Eby and Prime Minister Mark Carney make an announcement about housing on June 18, 2026 in the River District of south Vancouver. Photo by Government of B.C.

Article content

By National Bank’s measure, nowhere in Canada is housing less affordable than in B.C. Yet the province is also sitting on thousands of empty new homes. According to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. data, B.C. had 5,849 finished, unsold condos in May — up sharply over the past year. Homes built, empty and waiting, in the very place people say they can’t find one.

Article content

Article content

That isn’t just a contradiction, it’s an opportunity. Picture a pantry full of food about to spoil while people go hungry at the door. Handing it over won’t end hunger — but it puts something real to good use and helps people who need it. That is the spirit of what the federal and provincial governments are trying: buy the empty units and turn them into affordable, rent-to-own homes. It’s opportunistic in the best sense of the word. And our position is simple: Don’t shut down a promising, innovative idea before you do the math.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Here’s the plan, without the noise: According to the two governments, the governments will spend roughly $1.45 billion to convert more than 2,200 vacant units into rent-to-own homes, bought below the cost of construction. Before we go much further, one thing is worth pointing out, because much of the coverage didn’t: this is separate from the $3.2-billion cut to development charges announced the same day. And while the story is often illustrated featuring Vancouver’s priciest towers, Premier David Eby says the deal won’t include the City of Vancouver — the empty units are mostly in Burnaby and Richmond.

Article content

Article content

More remedial math: Of the announced $1.45 billion, only about $300 million is direct government money — roughly $135,000 per unit. The rest is financing and, as Eby notes, the mortgage becomes an asset the public holds, not money spent. Building the same homes from scratch would cost more and take years, but these are ready to house people now. There is a knock-on effect, too — fill 2,200 units and you free up as many as 2,200 rentals for the next family down the ladder.

Article content

There is a catch, and it’s real. New condos like these run at an average of $1.1 million, according to analyst Mark Goodman — so 2,200 at market prices would cost $2.2 billion to $2.5 billion, well above the $1.45-billion budget. Obviously, the math only works if governments buy at a deep discount. And that will be the number to judge — not a reason to reject the idea before we’ve seen it.

Article content

To be clear, this is where this proposal succeeds or fails.

Article content

Pay yesterday’s prices and taxpayers lose. Force developers into fire-sale prices and you risk discouraging the very investment needed to build tomorrow’s housing. Somewhere between the two extremes lies a fair price — one that reflects today’s market rather than yesterday’s expectations.