Michael Higgins: And just like that, the French language is protected …

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer speaks to the press outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 24, 2026. Photo by JIM WATSON /AFP via Getty Images

Article content

One of the big issues in the Canada-U.S. trade war — the one about language, culture and sovereignty no less — has been settled.

Article content

It’s remarkable what can be achieved when the two sides aren’t even talking to each other.

Article content

Article content

Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc posted on social media on Tuesday, “Canada welcomes that the U.S. is now withdrawing its positions on discoverability and labelling and is confirming that measures to promote French language and Canadian culture will not be subject to future U.S. trade actions.

Article content

Article content

“We look forward to further constructive U.S. clarifications on their other positions which would create the possibility of a mutually beneficial trade agreement that respects Canadian sovereignty.”

Article content

Article content

It appears LeBlanc was responding to an interview given by U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to the CBC that was at least forthright in setting out the U.S. positions.

Article content

Tariffs on medium and heavy trucks were always going to be heavier than autos, said Greer, who also made clear that returning manufacturing back to America was a prime goal.

Article content

“We are trying to reindustrialize 25 years after suffering from globalization where we lost five million jobs, 30,000 factories,” said Greer. “For weeks I’ve been clear about what we could deliver.”

Article content

It was the Canadians, claimed Greer, who “at the end” said that when they were talking of autos they meant “everything from a little escort to the biggest truck you can think of.”

Article content

Canada and the U.S. are agreed that tariffs on those trucks are an area of great disagreement. And considering the economic fallout, especially for Ontario, it is a red line for Canada.

Article content

Article content

On Saturday, Prime Minister Mark Carney pointed to a second issue that had caused the breakdown of talks accusing the U.S. of trying to impose restrictions on Canada pursuing free trade agreements with other countries.

Article content

Article content

“Unacceptable,” said Carney. “One thing we were not going to accept was any restriction on those deals.”

Article content

But listening to what Carney later said in his news conference, and what Greer told the CBC on Wednesday night, the issue is not so black and white. The U.S. and Canada may be a lot closer in their positions.

Article content

Greer said Carney’s characterization that the U.S. was trying to restrict Canadian free trade deals “goes far beyond anything we have discussed.”

Article content

He said Canadian provincial and federal officials wanted to create Fortress North America — “their term not mine” — which would require those within the north American market to “protect its borders.”

Article content

“We can’t have Canada be a place where you can get flooded with steel and aluminum from other countries and be used as a back door into the U.S.,” said Greer. “We have to have mutual protection.”

Article content

Carney made a similar argument Saturday.