Still no unanimous verdict for Massachusetts woman accused of killing her three children
Published Sep 03, 2026 • Last updated 2 hours ago • 2 minute read

See more Toronto Sun on Google — save as a Preferred Source
Advertisement 2
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
- Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
- Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
- Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
- Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
- Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
- Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
Article content
The jury deciding the fate of a Massachusetts woman accused of killing her three children was sent home Thursday after six days of deliberations without coming to a verdict.
Article content
Article content
Judge William Sullivan dismissed the deadlocked group of nine women and three men for the day at the courthouse in Plymouth, where the trial is taking place.
Earlier in the afternoon, the jury handed a note to Sullivan following several hours of deliberations. The judge then reinstructed the group on the definition of reasonable doubt.
“I just wanted to go over a couple things this afternoon,” Sullivan told the jurors, reports CNN.
“First off, I want to remind you that you are required to follow my instructions on the law as I gave them to you. I also want to at this point go over the instruction that I gave you about reasonable doubt.”
He then read those instructions and told the jury to continue their discussions to determine whether Clancy is guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter. She could also be found not guilty due to lack of criminal responsibility.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Article content
Advertisement 3
Article content
A short time later, the jury was sent home for the day and is set to return Friday morning for a seventh day of deliberations.

Courtroom drama
The courtroom drama began when defence lawyer Kevin Reddington spoke to the judge after the jury was sent back to resume their deliberations, seeking to dismiss one juror who appears to be holding up a unanimous verdict.
“Can I suggest respectfully that the soft instruction that you gave them saying, at the sidebar, ‘Can you listen to the law as I instruct you?’, does not focus on the issue,” Reddington said.
“The question is not sufficient enough. It does not allow any foundation for a motion to remove the juror who refuses to accept your instructions from on the law.”
Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said she had no objection with the judge’s instructions that allowed the jury to continue their discussions.
Read More
-
Lindsay Clancy murder trial: Jury deadlocked for second straight day
-
Lindsay Clancy jurors deadlocked, judge sends them back to try again
-
Lindsay Clancy: Jury has options in high-profile murder trial
Advertisement 4
Article content
Deadlocked jury
On Tuesday and Wednesday, the jurors told the judge that the group was deadlocked, and each day they were told to come back to court to work towards a verdict.
If a jury ultimately decides they cannot reach a unanimous verdict, the judge can declare a mistrial. However, with the group’s permission, a judge could instruct them to continue deliberating.
Clancy, 36, has admitted she killed her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — at the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023 while her husband was out running errands.

However, her defence team has maintained she was hearing voices inside her head due to postpartum psychosis and sought mental health care.
Clancy’s lawyers argued she was overprescribed medications and should not be held criminally liable for the deaths.
After she strangled her children with exercise bands, Clancy attempted to kill herself and leapt from her bedroom window, which left her paralyzed from the waist down and confined to a wheelchair.
RECOMMENDED VIDEO
We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Article content
.png)
1 week ago
18
















Bengali (BD) ·
English (US) ·