Letters to The Vancouver Sun: Adversarial relationship between mayor's office and health authority serves no one well

Vancouver Coastal Health has announced a new location for the Thomus Donaghy Overdose Prevention Site. Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim and business groups oppose the proposed facility. Photo by Doug Quan/PNG

Article content

Article content

As someone who has been providing services to drug users in the inner city since 1998, I am bemused by the “Not In My Back Yard” narrative about the proposed supervised consumption site at 900 Helmcken St.

Article content

Article content

Let us first note that its presence would immediately address the open drug use phenomenon at the SRO around the corner, bringing it indoors and addressing a problem the neighbourhood has been facing for years.

Article content

Article content

As for questions that will affect the broader community, these can be addressed proactively by a committee of the facility’s operators and residents and businesses that will be in place.

Article content

Article content

But the most serious issue is the clearly adversarial relationship between the mayor and the health authority that seems to have conflicting agendas and absolutely no desire to work together on this. This relationship should have been cultivated throughout the mayor’s mandate. It was not. Hopefully, the next mayor will view this as a priority that will serve all Vancouverites well, particularly the most vulnerable among us.

Article content

Dr. Brian Conway, president and medical director, Vancouver Infectious Diseases Centre

Article content

Debate over OPIs feels like a giant game of chess

Article content

Article content

The debate over Vancouver’s newest overdose prevention site exposes a deeper problem in how we talk about addiction and recovery.

Article content

Public health officials focus on preventing deaths. Residents and businesses worry about safety and disorder. Politicians battle over optics and jurisdiction. Advocates focus on access and compassion. Each perspective contains legitimate concerns.

Article content

Article content

Yet the system keeps producing the same conflict without resolution.

Article content

Open a site and communities push back. Close a site and overdose risks increase. Consult extensively and governments are accused of delay. Move quickly and they are accused of ignoring residents.

Article content

Increasingly, the debate feels like a giant game of chess where every move creates a counter-move, stalemate after stalemate. But perhaps the deeper problem is that we are no longer even sure what “winning” looks like. We could replace every person in these roles and likely end up with the same outcome.

Article content

We are fighting endlessly over methods because we no longer agree on what success in addiction recovery actually means.

Article content

If survival is the only metric, we will build one kind of system. If recovery, stability, reconnection, and meaning also matter, we may build another. Until we answer that question honestly, the stalemate, the suffering, and the loss of life will continue.

Article content

Dr. Larry Smith, Parksville

Article content

Public funds spent on World Cup should be detailed

Article content