Justice minister ‘open’ to expanding definition of sexual deepfakes as opposition MPs eye widening provision

Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Sean Fraser speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa April 20, 2026. Photo by Blair Gable /Postmedia

Article content

OTTAWA — Canada’s justice minister expressed an openness Tuesday to expanding the government’s definition of sexualized deepfakes, as opposition MPs push for amendments to the proposed law to criminalize their distribution. 

Article content

Sean Fraser spoke one day ahead of when parliamentarians on the justice committee are expected to begin their clause-by-clause study of Bill C-16, the Liberals’ latest justice legislation that, among other reforms, seeks to update the Criminal Code definition of an “intimate images” to include those that are a “visual representation.”

Article content

Article content

Article content

“I would like to make sure that those proposed amendments or revisions are based on the testimony that came before the committee, to ensure that it’s informed by expert testimony,” he told reporters after Tuesday’s cabinet meeting.

Article content

Article content

Targeting the distribution of sexual images made by “electronic or mechanical means” is how Prime Minister Mark Carney is looking to fulfill his promise made during last year’s federal election campaign to criminalize the act of distributing “sexualized deepfakes” of someone without their consent. 

Article content

The term largely refers to sexual images made using generative AI, a phenomenon police, school board and advocates against gender-based violence have been warning for years has been increasing.

Article content

The Liberals specifically touted its latest justice bill, an omnibus piece of legislation that also targets mandatory minimum sentencing and stiffer punishments for certain offences, for its efforts to target sexualized deepfakes.

Article content

But advocates and experts who testified before the parliamentary justice committee warned that the government’s definition was too narrow and risked not capturing images that could be found too unrealistic. They questioned its ability to address the spread of images in which someone may not be fully naked but “nearly nude,” as were shown could be created by Elon Musk’s Grok AI chatbot on X.

Article content

Article content

Witnesses also called on the MPs to target not only the distribution of such images, but their very creation.

Article content

Article content

NDP MP Leah Gazan confirmed her party intends to present amendments on Wednesday to widen the government’s proposed scope.

Article content

“It needs to be expanded,” Gazan said Tuesday, “certainly around nudes, certainly clarity around the definition about what a deepfake is.”

Article content

“It’s still unclear in the bill.”

Article content

The Conservatives are also eyeing changes, with Ontario MP Larry Brock, who sits on the justice committee, suggesting that the party’s other members on the committee had amendments coming to deal with the issue. 

Article content

Fraser told reporters that the government based its definition on the Criminal Code’s wording around the spread of the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, commonly known as “revenge porn.”

Article content

The minister said the Liberals wanted to “mirror” that language as “there is significant jurisprudence on this issue, drawing precisely where the line may exist as to what ought to be criminal and what ought not to be criminal.”

Article content

Fraser said while he was open to changes, he did not “want to compromise on the timeline to the point where we’re now kicking this bill into the fall.”