Judge bars U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro from charging ex-Olympian in Reflecting Pool case

WASHINGTON — A Superior Court judge in the District of Columbia has permanently banned U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office from bringing charges against a former Olympic canoeist over damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Judge Todd Edelman entered an order on Thursday that dismissed the case with prejudice. Edelman cited the “exceptional circumstances” of the case and said the government’s “own representations make plain” that bringing another indictment against David “Davey” Hearn “is theoretical at best, and more likely, is simply fanciful.”

Trump, Edelman wrote, “has criticized the decision of the Office of the United States Attorney to drop the case in the most vituperative terms; demanded that the government reinstitute the prosecution, in part because of Mr. Hearn’s political activity and the identity of one of his attorneys; and publicly entertained the possibility of firing the United States Attorney as a result of the dismissal.”

Hearn, Edelman wrote, “faces the unique possibility that the government will revive this case — one that it has already announced to be meritless — based on political pressure brought by the President of the United States upon his subordinate officers.” The government “has no right to retain the ability to compound the errors it has already made, or even to threaten to do so, at Mr. Hearn’s expense,” Edelman wrote.

Trump had lashed out at Hearn over political donations and because one of his lawyers, Norm Eisen, has been a longtime Trump critic involved in many legal battles against the administration.

Eisen and Hearn’s other attorneys — Mary Dohrmann, Steve Levin and Michael Bromwich — said in a joint statement that the decision “is a victory for the rule of law and for an innocent American seeking justice” and said the case never should have been brought in the first place.

“This was a miscarriage of justice, and what happened to Mr. Hearn is an outrage that should shock every American,” they wrote. “This administration chose to pursue an unjust prosecution against Mr. Hearn. It should not get repeated chances to wield the power of criminal prosecution against someone who should never have been prosecuted. Today’s decision protects Mr. Hearn from that threat, allowing him to move forward with his life as he deserves.”

Pirro’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Attorneys for Hearn and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia sparred in court last month over whether Hearn’s Reflecting Pool case should be dismissed with prejudice, meaning prosecutors would be barred from bringing another case against him. At the center of much of the discussion: Donald Trump’s pressure campaign on Pirro’s office and his decision to link his desire for prosecution to the political beliefs of Hearn and one of his attorneys, Norm Eisen.

Pirro’s office dropped the case in late July after evidence showed the area was already damaged, and Hearn’s team moved to ban the office from bringing another case in August.

At an unrelated press conference last month, Pirro declined to answer several questions from reporters about her handling of the Reflecting Pool case.

Former Olympian David Hearn outside D.C. Superior Court in July.Daniel Heuer / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

Pirro’s office wanted to maintain its ability to bring a theoretical case, even though its own evidence — that the section of the Reflecting Pool that Hearn allegedly touched was already damaged, and they can’t prove more than $1,000 in damage — would make bringing another felony case impossible.

“What future prosecution could even occur?” Edelman asked at the hearing.

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCBP leaders cut out of Trump ad buy decision

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAmerican passenger drafted goodbye texts to her family as Flydubai plane plummeted

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation pushes embattled New York prosecutor into national spotlight

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between slain New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

For Subscribers

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCBP leaders cut out of Trump ad buy decision

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAmerican passenger drafted goodbye texts to her family as Flydubai plane plummeted

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCornell rape allegation pushes embattled New York prosecutor into national spotlight

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAbdul El-Sayed tries to woo MAHA voters as Democrats seek inroads with RFK’s supporters

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKratom-like substances are popping up in a typically benign supplement

FOR SUBSCRIBERSGOP super PAC increases its spending for Sen. Jon Husted in tough Ohio race

FOR SUBSCRIBERSRecords reveal tumultuous marriage between slain New York Times executive and wife

FOR SUBSCRIBERSFrom clean energy warrior to ‘wall of shame,’ James Talarico reverses on a fossil fuel money pledge

FOR SUBSCRIBERSCongressional staff planned official trip with luxury stops in Italy and France weeks before election

FOR SUBSCRIBERSA harrowing ordeal aboard an Israel-bound plane

FOR SUBSCRIBERSOpenAI CEO Sam Altman to skip congressional hearing on rogue AI agents

FOR SUBSCRIBERSKey DOJ lawyers departed Trump ‘grand conspiracy’ probe amid pressure to produce, source says

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTrump’s new AI chatbot often links to a site launched under Clinton 26 years ago

FOR SUBSCRIBERSAt MAHA summit, industry CEOs the movement once vilified take the stage

FOR SUBSCRIBERSThis Paralympian has two goals: Win medals and give away $500,000 to her teammates

“That I don’t know,” said Michael Spence, a career official in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.

“Give me an example of one possible thing that could happen” to change the fundamentally flawed case, the judge asked. “Even theoretically, what could there be?”

Spence conceded he had no satisfactory answer. He added that the U.S. Attorney’s Office had no investigation going into Hearn “as of this second” but said that could change.

Edelman noted that it was going to be pretty difficult to find a case with similar circumstances to Hearn’s case, and asked Spence how he was supposed to look at Trump’s statements calling for a prosecution that Pirro’s office admits was meritless. The president’s statements, Spence said, “speak for themselves.”

Steve Levin, an attorney for Hearn, said prosecutors “had no case” and that the government abused its prosecutorial discretion by rushing to indict Hearn to please the president, misleading a grand jury along the way.

“That’s where the bad faith comes into play,” Levin said. How is Hearn supposed to trust the grand jury process, Levin asked, given that the case got through before? “There’s no confidence that Mr. Hearn has that the grand jury will do the right thing” if another case was presented,” he said.

Jeanine Pirro is U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images file

Pirro’s office, Levin argued, is trying to keep a “discredited felony accusation on life support,” and doing so served no public interest.

“There is nothing that can save the case they dismissed,” Levin said. “The government has basically acknowledged there is nothing that can revive this case.”

But Spence said the grand jury process would still give Hearn protection from a bad faith prosecution.

“The government did act in good faith in this case,” Spence argued.