Jamie Sarkonak: Why this sex offender won’t have to go on the national registry

Supreme Court of Canada photographed in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 19, 2026. Photo by HYUNGCHEOL PARK/Postmedia

Article content

A temporary resident named Karandeep Singh was convicted of sexual assault in Prince George, B.C., last month, but — after the judge heard that Singh faced potential deportation — he was exempt from the national sex offender registry.

Article content

There was a time when this would have been impossible, as the written law requires all sexual assault convicts to be placed on the registry. In 2022, however, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled this to be unconstitutional and downgraded the registration of sex offenders from mandatory to optional. Whether to put someone on the list was left up to individual judges, who were much more merciful than Parliament.

Article content

Article content

Article content

The Supreme Court reasoned back then that the onerous responsibilities that come with being on the sex offender registry weren’t appropriate or necessary for every single sex offender, and therefore a blanket requirement to register was a state infringement on the Charter right to liberty.

Article content

Article content

There is indeed a burden that comes with being a registered sex offender. They have to report employment and residence addresses to police, as well as keep police apprised of any travel that would take them away from home for a week or more. They’re also subject to random police checks, and if they’re caught not abiding by the rules, they can face up to two years in jail. And while the registry isn’t public, and isn’t even accessible by most police in most situations, it does still have privacy implications.

Article content

It’s understandable that this could be viewed as too harsh as things currently stand. The spectrum of “sexual assault” ranges from regretted drunken mistake taken seriously by a zealous prosecutor, to over-clothes groping, to violently snatching a woman off the sidewalk, pulling her into the bushes and raping her.

Article content

Article content

Rapists and sexual predators belong in the sex offender registry. But there should be hesitation to loop them in with people who commit scandalous sexual impropriety that feels like it falls short of criminal. It would have seemed unfair, for example, to place the four Canadian junior hockey players acquitted of sexual assault charges last year on the registry if they had lost their case, seeing how the complainant demanded they have sex with her (only two of the men did so, with consent).

Article content

More recently, in Alberta, a cult leader’s several sexual assault charges were stayed due to prosecutorial tampering with evidence. He was alleged to have manipulated followers into having ritual sex with him. It’s wrong, scummy, gross, odious — but illegal? If women can’t consent to sex with problematic leadership figures, well, we’re not exactly treating them like independent adults anymore, are we?

Article content

But the case that the Supreme Court used to end the mandatory registration of sex offenders on a national list was a lot less grey. The man challenging his placement on the list was Eugene Ndhlovu, guilty of sexually assaulting two women at a house party in 2015. The Alberta Court of Appeal’s summary of events states that he “touched both women’s buttocks and tried to grab their breasts while posing for a picture”; then, he rubbed the rear of one without her consent, and later on, the other “awoke to find the respondent’s fingers inside her vagina.”