Half of Canadians say it’s hard to stay friends with people who disagree on international conflicts: poll

Major international conflicts are making it harder for some Canadians to remain friends with people who have differing views, according to a poll. Photo by Srdjanns74 /Getty Images

Article content

There’s no denying that digital and social media have only amplified the identity politics, erosion of trust and geopolitical shifts that have polarized mankind this century. New polling by the Association for Canadian Studies shows that polarization is emerging at the interpersonal level.

Article content

More than twice as many Canadians (52 per cent) think it’s getting harder and harder for people with differing opinions “on major international conflicts to remain friends” than those who feel it’s not more difficult (21 per cent).

Article content

Article content

Article content

“These issues are increasingly divisive and polarizing,” Association for Canadian Studies president Jack Jedwab told National Post in an interview.

Article content

Article content

More than a quarter (27 per cent) are unsure, a feeling expressed by a third of women (33 per cent) and close to a third of the oldest demographics — 55-65 (32 per cent) and 65-plus (31 per cent).

Article content

Respondents were asked about the reconcilability of four conflicts — Russia and Ukraine; Russia and the U.S.; Iran and Western countries; and Israelis and Palestinians.

Article content

It didn’t surprise Jedwab then that the latter conflict emerged as the least reconcilable (14 per cent) among respondents.

Article content

Article content

Article content

“The polarity is probably confirmed by the fact that very few people think it’s reconcilable, which is interesting, because you do hear from many people that seem to, in their own sort of spaces, feel that these issues can be reconciled if both parties would do this or that,” Jedwab told National Post in an interview.

Article content

“So if you think that’s the case, one can only imagine how challenging it is for reconciliation with people who are living the experience on the ground where they happen to be, in this particular case, the Middle East.”

Article content

Article content

Only the mostly dormant Russia-U.S. conflict is seen as more reconcilable (35 per cent) than not (29 per cent), but the largest percentage (36) are unsure.

Article content

Article content

Polling found a consistent pattern regardless of respondents’ language, whether anglophone, francophone or allophone, “suggesting that the polarizing effects of international conflicts cross linguistic boundaries,” Jedwab wrote in the poll.

Article content

Article content

That consistency is “something that we can all build as a consensus around the extent to which this thing is divisive,” he added in conversation.

Article content

Reducing polarization, he said, begins with “thoughtful” conversations about complex subjects that involve the realities of the people on the ground for whom reconciliation is most difficult and for whom the situation is evolving.

Article content

“We need to sort of identify parameters for how these conversations can be done in the most thoughtful way possible, recognizing that… many of us, even though we may have disproportionate degrees of connections to what’s going on there, we still need to engage and find thoughtful ways of engaging in dialogue.”