Afternoon front page: What happened to Block Parents?; October 7 attacks praised in government-funded journal; and more

Tara Mondou is a Block Parent in her Cambridge, Ont. community, one of the few remaining Block Parent neighbourhoods in Ontario. 'I wake up every morning. I open my own curtain, I put the Block Parent sign in the window," she says. Photo by Peter J. Thompson/National Post

Article content

It’s Friday, October 9. Here are the top stories we’re following today.

Article content

Modern Life: What killed Block Parent? How paranoia drove the red-and-white sign from the neighbourhood

Article content

Article content

Started in 1968 by a group of Jewish moms in London, Ont., the Canadian program gave generations of children a familiar place to turn when they needed help. But from its peak in the early 1990s, when it counted more than 500,000 participating households across Canada, Block Parent has now disappeared from much of the country. Its decline traces a broader shift in the way Canadians raise children, know their neighbours and think about safety.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Israeli soldiers and journalists gather around a damaged powered paraglider used by terrorists in Kfar Aza, in the south of Israel bordering the Gaza Strip, on Oct. 10, 2023. Photo by Thomas Coex/AFP via Getty Images

Article content

Government-funded journal under review after poem applauds October 7 Hamas attack

Article content

The poem, called Flood, was written by Bahar Orang and is featured in the latest issue of The Ex-Puritan, a journal funded by the Canada Council for the Arts. Flood describes the events of an October morning, a reference to Oct. 7, 2023, when 1,200 Israelis were murdered by Hamas terrorists. “Praise the paragliders, their gentle ascension, their unbroken morning, and of course their triumphant descension,” starts one line.

Article content

Article content

Justice Minister and Attorney General of Canada Sean Fraser speaks during a news conference about upcoming changes to the medical assistance in dying legislation, in the House of Commons foyer in Ottawa on Oct. 7, 2026. Photo by Blair Gable/Postmedia

Article content

Why Ottawa plans to allow MAID for people incapable of consenting moments before death

Article content

The Criminal Code generally requires that a person has the capacity to consent to receive medical assistance in dying immediately before death is administered. However, the federal Liberals are proposing to allow people with a serious and incurable disease that will eventually lead to incapacity — Alzheimer’s disease, for example — request MAID in advance if their health reaches certain conditions that they outline. Critics say the government is preparing to cross a new line that raises a number of ethical concerns.

Article content

Article content

Article content

A Hikvision security camera seen at the Embassy of People’s Republic of China in Ottawa on Friday, Aug. 28, 2026. Photo by Hyungcheol Park/Postmedia

Article content

How a Chinese surveillance camera giant operated ‘illegally’ in Canada for almost a decade before being banned

Article content

Hikvision never notified the Canadian government when it began operating in Canada in 2015, a mandatory step that allows Ottawa to review it for national security concerns. The company, which is partly owned by the Chinese government, has been blacklisted by governments around the world over concerns about espionage and cybersecurity. Today, there are over 28,700 of the company’s devices connected to public-facing internet connections in Canada and likely far more on private connections.

Article content

Article content

Quebec’s premier-designate Paul St-Pierre Plamondon will be hoping that the court strikes down Bill 21 and sets strict limits on how provincial governments can invoke the Charter of Rights’ “notwithstanding” clause, John Ivison suggests. Photo by Francis Vachon for Postmedia

Article content

John Ivison: A Bill 21 explosion could engulf Carney, Quebec and Canada

Article content

The Supreme Court of Canada is due to rule on the constitutionality of Quebec’s Bill 21, which forbids school boards from hiring teachers who wear a hijab, kippah or turban. The court will also rule on the constitutionality of the province’s pre-emptive use of the Charter of Rights’ “notwithstanding” clause when it passed the contentious legislation. The ruling has the potential to reignite separatist sentiment in Quebec and reverberate further. “There has been an unsteady balance of power between the judicial and legislative branches of government ever since (the adoption of the Charter), and it is now teetering as never before,” Ivison writes.

Article content

Article content